Don't I get a cookie?

Spike ,'Never Leave Me'


Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...

To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])


EpicTangent - Jun 26, 2012 8:16:22 am PDT #9895 of 11998
Why isn't everyone pelting me with JOY, dammit? - Zenkitty

Other cast members include Kyle Schmid and Franka Potente.

Now I'm even more interested.

P.S. Consuela, your link is missing the close-paren, so it takes you to a re-direct-type page.


Consuela - Jun 26, 2012 8:22:15 am PDT #9896 of 11998
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

Fixed: it was a relic of our shortcut function, it wouldn't include the close-paren, so I just redid it as HTML myself.


Zenkitty - Jun 26, 2012 11:07:10 am PDT #9897 of 11998
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

I've heard about Copper. Looking forward to it.


Scrappy - Jun 26, 2012 12:16:20 pm PDT #9898 of 11998
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

Me, too.


Sheryl - Jun 26, 2012 12:17:14 pm PDT #9899 of 11998
Fandom means never having to say "But where would I wear that?"

Me, as well.(Historical + police procedural? Yes, please)


Vortex - Jun 26, 2012 4:36:42 pm PDT #9900 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Is anyone watching "Inside Men"? I can't figure out if I just don't like it or because I don't like 2 out of the 3 main actors.


le nubian - Jun 27, 2012 12:22:53 am PDT #9901 of 11998
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

Vortex,

I saw it a few months back and I want you to explain the end to me because I have been puzzling over the end off and on for weeks and I can't for the life of me figure out if they ended it this way due to incompetence or if it was intentional or both.


§ ita § - Jun 29, 2012 5:58:55 pm PDT #9902 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm confused by something on Suits--the bit where the returning partner says he stole Jessica's tea set because his deceased wife had given it to her.

Is that supposed to be rational and defensible? In what world?

It sounds creepy and needy more than anything else.

Interesting corner they took with Louis. I kinda mostly buy it, since they haven't been showing him as incompetent, really--more of just an asshole and an asskisser. I mean, he'd have to be more than competent to work at such a demanding firm. It's just that Mike and Harvey and Jessica are crazy good.

Speaking of creepy--David Costabile is giving me shiver with the unctuous performance as Daniel. I can't tell--he could be malicious, or he could be sincere. Very confuse.

And, good lord--I think I google Meghan Markle every week. She is *gorgeous*. I can't get over the construction of her face. Such a great balance. And, hey! More light brown people with freckles. The world can't hae enough of those. Fuck, there's a lot of beautiful in this cast...


-t - Jun 29, 2012 6:15:35 pm PDT #9903 of 11998
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I assumed he was lying because that didn't make any sense. I mean, you want something to remind you of your wife, bring something from home, geez. But if he was just taking something of Jessica's to see if he could get away with it without anyone saying anything, he wouldn't want to say so.


§ ita § - Jun 29, 2012 7:10:22 pm PDT #9904 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

He either conveyed one of two things: a) I have extreme attachment issues and don't respect your boundaries or b) I'm a lying liar that lies as he drinks tea.

He doesn't seem stupid, so the weirdness of that admission took me by surprise. It's the closest thing to a chink he's displayed.