I have not watched more than ten minutes of The Office. Never liked it. But as soon as I walked past the clip in the editing bay I went "The Office?" and John nodded. It's that much a thing in my head.
That said, I liked this week's ep. I liked the conceit of them trying to do their thing under constant supervision as that slowly became complicit supervision. I liked seeing them even more try and get into normal people roles. I really liked the big not-bad guy. And I always love a little bit of confessional.
What was incomprehensible about the plot? I thought it was extra super spare because they weren't paying attention to anything. Someone was doing something weird...printing counterfeit money...and then the episode ended. My criticism would be that the plot was too simple, and there was only one scammy trick thing beyond their very presence. Not much happened. It was all character, no heist.
I loved the character bits enough to override the light plot. And ita !, you hit it. It is pretty much no heist.
About the only character beat I kinda missed seeing was Hardison being jealous/protecting Parker from the skeevy documentary dude. But I guess he was too into his conflict with Eliot.
Jimmy Joe Meeker is Rockford's backslapping cowboy alter ego...I missed that that was the alias.
I thought the episode was funny, but not as exciting as usual.
What was incomprehensible about the plot? I thought it was extra super spare because they weren't paying attention to anything. Someone was doing something weird...printing counterfeit money...and then the episode ended.
I guess that was what was incomprehensible? Perhaps I am not being precise with language? It was hard to care or comprehend because they weren't paying attention to (or caring about) anything. You pretty much hit the nail on the head of what I thought about it, but I didn't like it and you did. Heh.
SOA: This show is so very fucked up!
I know!
I was saying that there was no believable way to keep Clay on the show, but, once again, I was wrong.
I like it! It wasn't my fave episode but it had some great lines, and I did love the little interviews with the characters.
BUT? Could Hardison's pants have been tighter? Don't get me wrong; I think tight pants on Hardison are a fine idea. But he had the male version of camel toe.
"No one throws Hardison off a roof. ....Except maybe me."
"I ate the damn sammich!"
"You have ze zoul of a German!"
"I LOVE foreplay!"
Yeah, I laughed a lot.
But he had the male version of camel toe.
When? Trust me, I was looking out for that sort of stuff.
Tom and Lorenzo have an interesting speculation at the end of their American Horror Story review -- I hadn't even thought of it, but it makes total sense.
And they were right! Almost wish I hadn't read it because I wouldn't have guessed it myself.
Loved the real story behind Larry's burned face. I was confused during the dinner scene because I could have sworn he was supposed to have been burned when he burned his family, and I thought it was some ridiculously huge continuity error or something. But no!
