It's not that it's right or wrong. It's simply how things were.

But I think that's what Liese is objecting to - by presenting Don's ploy working as "simply how things were," the show makes assumptions about Japanese business culture that are based on stereotypes and cliche.

Now granted, the same is true in many cases about the show's presentation of American business culture, but we also see examples of what else Americans were like in the early 60's. S1 was all about showing the audience first, here is a cliched 1950's office environment and second, here's why it's rapidly becoming dated in its own time. Honda, by contrast, is a one-ep gag whose primary purpose is to show us that Don is clever and Roger is racist.

Snippets from John's latest answer post:

Parker's foster parents were in the house when it exploded.

Christian Kane performed the stunt where he got hit by the car in The Boost Job himself.

But I think that's what Liese is objecting to - by presenting Don's ploy working as "simply how things were," the show makes assumptions about Japanese business culture that are based on stereotypes and cliche.

But aren't they stereotypes and clichés as they would have existed in that time?

And I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I saw the Honda issue as showing us that Don, himself, thinks he's clever and that Roger doesn't see himself as a racist but sees his attitude as perfectly justified.

And I'm doing a crappy job of explaining myself and by no means, am I discounting Liese's discomfort with the turn the show took in that episode.

But aren't they stereotypes and clichés as they would have existed in that time?

They're the same ones that exist today - Japanese are obsessed with formalities, they highly value honor and rules, they're easily offended by Americans who don't know those rules, etc etc etc.

That Don's scheme worked implies strongly that the writers believe those stereotypes to be true. If he had failed - if the Honda execs had looked at him and said "You're crazy - why would you think we'd pick a company who presented nothing over one that bent the rules a little and really impressed us??" - we wouldn't be having this conversation at all.

They're the same ones that exist today - Japanese are obsessed with formalities, they highly value honor and rules, they're easily offended by Americans who don't know those rules, etc etc etc.

Weren't Japanese business practices in the sixties very formal though?

How is that more or less stereotypical than getting whores for clients in Manhattan?

You've made me very thinky, Liese.

Most of thinking is ongoing, but I have reached one conclusion. The few times that I've read behind-the-scenese interviews and whatnot regarding Mad Men, they made me like the show less, so I pretty much stopped reading them. But I think the reason for that is that the show's intent and what I get from it are very different. In part because I don't see these characters as first-person past. And partly because things that are widespread are not necessarily universal and I feel like that distinction is not made in the universe building.

Which I don't exactly mean as a ding, just that, I don't think they are doing what they think they are doing, but what they are actually doing is worth watching, to me, anyway.

Well, that's a nice muddy thought that doesn't say much. Back in the oven with you, idea.

How is that more or less stereotypical than getting whores for clients in Manhattan?

Because for every time the show gives us something cliched about American business culture, it also gives us the exception to that rule - we're shown over and over again that not everyone is like that, even in this time and place.

By contrast, every Japanese exec we've seen so far has been a confirmation of stereotypes rather than an exploration. And since clients in this show tend to be foils for the main characters, I'm guessing we're not going to see Don's assumptions challenged any time soon.

Because for every time the show gives us something cliched about American business culture, it also gives us the exception to that rule - we're shown over and over again that not everyone is like that, even in this time and place.

Well then, I suppose it's possible we'll still see the exception to the rule, especially in a very unexpected manner. That's something the show has been very consistent about.

Parker's foster parents were in the house when it exploded.

He did say "she blew up her foster parents" didn't he? It took me a second to realize he'd actually said that.

Christian Kane performed the stunt where he got hit by the car in The Boost Job himself.

I watched that scene about five times saying, "That sure LOOKS like him. It can't be; they'd never let him do THAT. No, I think that's really him!" As we'd say affectionately back home, that boy's crazy.

Hoodsurfing. IJS.