So, no, then?
Willow ,'The Killer In Me'
Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...
To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])
Well, what kind of con? Was it a Creation con?
They're non-genre?
No, it wasn't a Creation con. I don't know how to answer "what kind of con", I'm afraid. The guy running it said he'd run "many" conventions before, and is based in Germany. I've no idea who he is, except that his name is Marc. I think it was him and a bunch of local volunteers. I'm suspicious of what cons he's actually run, because they totally didn't seem to know how to handle the amount of people they dealing with. It was a great con, just kinda badly handled on certain aspects. (Once registration tops 250, you ought to know it's not going to be a "small, intimate party for our supporters" anymore. IJS.)
Oooh, can we decide what shows are "genre" and which aren't again? I like that having that discussion way better when it doesn't involve going to Lightbulbs. Unless it'll get all messy here. Then, no.
Starsky & Hutch had ZebraCon going back to 1979.
Yeah, and I went to four Nikita cons, so.
They're non-genre?
Meaning, not science fiction or fantasy.
eta I don't wanna have the genre/non-genre discussion! I'm just reporting what was stated, rather proudly, at the con, regardless of whether they were right.
LFN isn't a genre show, is it? That's my one con, right there. I mean, for values of "genre" that equal SFF. If "genre" equals fannish, then they are, especially...if they have a con.
I'm obviously biased on the John Rogers front, but I've been a fan of his almost as long as I've been a friend. He's good people, and has apologised for both Catwoman and The Core.
Meaning, not science fiction or fantasy.
Yeah, but Leverage is BOTH! It just doesn't know it. (I got Paul to stop rolling his eyes by saying, "Look, just pretend they are all superheroes and set your disbelief sensors on "Comic book."")