Also, the bank guy was the guy from Drive !
Who was also the director of a few season 1 Buffys.
Jonathan ,'Lies My Parents Told Me'
To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])
Also, the bank guy was the guy from Drive !
Who was also the director of a few season 1 Buffys.
We watched Leverage last night, and I loved the fact that they all showed up for the play knowing it would be terrible.
The reaction when she said that her acting was better than her singing was priceless.
LEVERAGELEVERAGELEVERAGE!!
Yes, I watched threefour and about a third times last night. What?
Exploding crotch! Hope diamond! Hacking the white house! I did the finger thing! People like locks! Nate getting totally conned by the team! Landlords!
SOPHIE AND ELIOT not CHECKING OUT NATE'S KINK STASH WTF???!!?
I NEED AT LEAST FOUR MORE VIEWINGS. NOT BECAUSE I AM CONFUSED. BECAUSE IT IS, umm, FRIDAY.
Finally, in case anyone's interested: Jon Rogers is doing fun post-show wrapups at the blog, apparently after each ep. It's a fun blog anyway.
I love that blog. This comment made me laugh (whitefonted, because I'm not sure if he's kidding or not):
Although we haven't done a proper wheelchair fight yet. I think we just shot the meat cvleaver fight last week ...
You know, I'm still not sure I get the briefcase thing. The flashback showed the guy stealing the briefcase from the car, and then Eliot said he found an empty briefcase by the crash...but we already knew that. I didn't understand what the "reveal" was supposed to be at the end. The guy took the papers out of the briefcase and left it empty by the crash, right?
I'm not sure if he's kidding or not
I spent a lot of my vacation time this summer mainlining Brisco County Jr, and the catchphrase for, apparently, everyone involved in the show in any way was " just under over-the-top". I'm realizing that Leverage is in exactly that place for me.
IOW, I have no idea if he's kidding. But I wouldn't be at all surprised if they did it.
You know, I'm still not sure I get the briefcase thing.
The fact that he was in possession of a stolen briefcase is incriminating.
Yeah, and the line just under over the top is a fine, fine line.
Right, re: briefcase. It's like they framed him for what he actually did.
Which I guess means it's a good thing they're using their powers for good and not for evil.
Landlord! Hardison is so hot when he's in control. IJS. It's my old competence kink kicking in.
You know, I'm still not sure I get the briefcase thing.
The fact that he was in possession of a stolen briefcase is incriminating.
No, I get that. But I don't understand why there were these flashbacks to why he had the briefcase. We already knew Eliot had taken the briefcase and they'd been using it. Was there some new connection we were supposed to make?