I'm really, really, really sorry about that.
Buffy: So how'd she get away with the bad mojo stuff? Anya: Giles sold it to her. Giles: Well, I didn't know it was her. I mean, how could I? If it's any consolation, I may have overcharged her.
'Sleeper'
Boxed Set, Vol. IV: It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that.
A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
Nora Deirdre - Jun 01, 2007 9:28:24 am PDT #2076 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
Dana - Jun 01, 2007 9:39:14 am PDT #2077 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
It's no problem for me, Nora, since I've seen it. And I generally disagree with you and Jon and ita on the whole thing, but I don't really have anything new to say about it. *g*
§ ita § - Jun 01, 2007 9:39:46 am PDT #2078 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I generally disagree with you and Jon and ita on the whole thing,
Really? Because I disagree with Jon and Nora. I think I missed your stance.
Nora Deirdre - Jun 01, 2007 9:40:41 am PDT #2079 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
I think I missed Dana's stance too.
Dana - Jun 01, 2007 9:47:26 am PDT #2080 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Maybe I disagree with everyone.
Though I thought the finale fell just short of being perfect, I loved the ambiguity, and I have a very hard time looking at it as simply "Sam woke up, was too messed up to go on, and killed himself." The creators claim that they never intended it to be ambiguous about whether he was actually mad, in a coma, or back in time, but I think the show itself never really answered that question, and I much prefer it that way.
I am dubious about the spinoff, but we'll see.
§ ita § - Jun 01, 2007 9:49:42 am PDT #2081 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I see. You do disagree with us all.
Hmm.
You see the ending as ambiguous--the three choices not ruled out being the ones you noted? Coma, crazy, actual time traveller?
Jon B. - Jun 01, 2007 9:50:44 am PDT #2082 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I'm not sure how that works in my brain, but it does.
However it works, it's also working in mine. That is to say, I loved it as well, despite my issues with the ending.
Nora Deirdre - Jun 01, 2007 9:52:36 am PDT #2083 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
I love that it keeps me thinking about it. I love(d) this show, and my hardcore gut reaction to the ending sort of speaks to my emotional investment.
I love that everyone has a different take.
I love that I can see other ppl's pov, because nothing fits perfectly. No matter how I interpret it, something's not quite right, logically speaking.
I feel like I've been processing this all day. I can't get enough of it, and I'm so sad that it's gone.
Crazy!
Fiona - Jun 01, 2007 9:56:53 am PDT #2084 of 10001
It's certainly a show that demands a very emotional response, that's for sure. I love reading other people's takes.
I'm also dubious about the spin-off (especially after the dreaded phrase, "think "Moonlighting"), but we'll see.
Dana - Jun 01, 2007 9:57:22 am PDT #2085 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
You do disagree with us all.
Fandom has taught me many useful things.
From the beginning, I realized that I believed that Sam was both in a coma and actually back in 1973. And possibly a little crazy. Nothing in the second series changed my mind on that.