Also, since it is a paraphrase, the emphasis could be on "necessarily"-- as in, he doesn't find all fat women sexually attractive as a matter of course-- some he does and dome he doesn't.

Although, I have to admit it shocked me at the end of the article.

Does no one believe in ineffability anymore?

I can't explain my ineffability beliefs.

ION, I heart today's guest-written Dinosaur Comics. Because it's so true!

And now there is someone on the ladder, but I still don't know why they are here.

Also, since it is a paraphrase

This is what I was coming back to comment on -- I think that, because it's NOT a direct quote, it's much more indicative of the reporter's/NYT's attitude towards standards of beauty (like Jess said) than it is about Nimoy's attitude.

[Note: I state the following while fervently hoping that I don't set off a debate about the definition of "art" versus "porn."]

Also, I think that Nimoy chose his words very deliberately to emphasize that, for HIM, this project is about creating art, creating something beautiful, and not creating something as disposable and detached as a stroke mag.

"yes, but are they fuckable?"

I heart Jessica.

Does no one believe in ineffability anymore?

Actually, I don't people do anymore

And now there is someone on the ladder, but I still don't know why they are here.

So they aren't telling you to get more coffee?

Does no one believe in ineffability anymore?

Actually, I don't people do anymore

That's pretty ineffable right there.