He doesn’t necessarily find them sexually attractive. “But I do think they’re beautiful.”
Interesting distinction to make. We're not beholden to find everything sexually attractive, but do you think this statement is going to undermine any of what he's done in the eyes of big women?
Looks like he approached his subjects in the Full Body Project with dignity and appreciation, not like he was taking a patronising or voyeuristic angle. And, you know, that's the core of it.
Hmm. I had this long post about bodies, mine in particular, that just seems incongruous here.
So you know how the Queen of England paid a visit to George W. Bush recently? Check out this accidentally humorous headline in a Caribbean newspaper: [link]
do you think this statement is going to undermine any of what he's done in the eyes of big women?
It hit me as hurtful initially, but after about 5 seconds, I understood it. There are male body types I don't find sexually attractive but consider beautiful.
Looks like he approached his subjects in the Full Body Project with dignity and appreciation, not like he was taking a patronising or voyeuristic angle
This was the key factor for me. He's not being exploitative or patronising. He's showing art.
this accidentally humorous headline
Accident? I don't know--the main Jamaican paper is the one that accompanied a bestiality story with a cartoon of a goat being buggered. It might be an accident that it got all the way through, but the tone is different in the islands.
It's weird. I had this post about how this skinny (and v. pretty with it) woman at krav was idealising my body, and it just felt weird. Like I have no place to talk, since I'm not fat. But I'm not skinny either, and having been various kinds of bodies I knew were close to textbook (slimmer and/or more ripped), it....I don't know. Odd. Like I should shut up.
Which I'm not entirely good at, huh?
Okay, someone in a nearby cube needs to stop clipping their nails. Someone else needs to find their beeping device and kill it.
Kat? You still around?
Interesting distinction to make. We're not beholden to find everything sexually attractive, but do you think this statement is going to undermine any of what he's done in the eyes of big women?
no, not at all. You can think that someone is beautiful and not be attracted to them.
You can think that someone is beautiful and not be attracted to them.
But thinking a type isn't sexually attractive seems so much more politically rife. I mean, I know I'd bristle if a guy said he thought black women are beautiful, but not sexually attractive.
I wouldn't have a leg to stand on in an argument, so I wouldn't have it, but I'm trying to imagine seeing that quote from a white guy in the press, and what would happen as a result.
I've written 16 convoluted sentences trying to explain what I felt - beautiful and even sensual are a judgment , or a quality I place on someone/something. Sexual attraction is more of feeling - which may are may nor be related to the qualities. ( this has a lot to do with the phenomenon I've noticed that the more you know someone the better or worse they look , depending on how much I like or dislike them )
You can think that someone is beautiful and not be attracted to them.
That's been my explanation for why my Kinsey score stays at 0. There are many beautiful women out there. None of them make me want to do things with them.
I think the statement "beautiful, but I'm not attracted to type X" could be hurtful -especially if said to you, who happens to be type x. But some people just have stronger attraction to a particular 'type'. My 'type' has gotten broader the older I get,so that i almost don't believe in the concept of type.
