I got the new covers.
They're not really saying anything to me.
And they need to stop with the word "geekdom" in the subtitle. I don't even think it needs a subtitle.
The cover with the pink marshmallow peeps with blood moustaches in a puddle of blood was very Jilli, though.
An article made for billytea: Solving the Mystery of Ducks' Genitalia (NYT). [link]
That is fantastic. There should be more articles like this. "Dr. Brennan was oblivious to bird phalluses until 1999." And the Argentinian lake duck gets in (so to speak) as world champion! But there's no mention of the homosexual mallard necrophiliac rapist. It seems a glaring omission.
Wait, they don't want to use the mouse one or what? Or are these more possibilities?
Make note of the ingredients in the facemask so you can avoid them at all possible costs in the future. And treat like everyone says.
Seriously -- yikes!
Good luck with the food stuff, Burrell....
And Yay for Stephanie!
I forget what else.
They don't want to use the mouse.
I'm sort of at a loss, just because the subtitle makes me so nuts.
But I like the mouse.
The mouse is on my wall at work.
Tell them the lurkers support you in email!
OK, not helpful. Hrm.
Timelies all!
Finally catching up.(I went to a concert last night directly from work, so there were a good number of posts here when I got on tonight)
G's on another business trip, so I had my usual for dinner.(Frozen "light" dinner - vegetable masala) Followed by Ben & Jerry's Creme Brulee which is a little too sugary.
Should we start an online petition in support of the mouse?
Should we start an online petition in support of the mouse?
Or mail the publishers blue gloves?