Love isn't brains, children, it's blood, blood screaming inside you to work its will.

Spike ,'Sleeper'


Other Media  

Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.


Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 15, 2004 7:32:06 am PDT #4865 of 10000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I may be misremembering, but I thought the "conspirators" included Wonder Woman among the heroes they couldn't allow to know about the Dr. Light situation. Then there was the bit about Zatanna not liking the dishonesty (Puh-lease! The woman's whole career is built around deception and misdirection), and Oliver's overprotective chauvinism toward Dinah (which was immediately challenged, but still contributes to the overall mood) .

Plus, I think the fact that they have this big conflict about what has to be done about Dr. Light, but don't bother to consult Sue for input, is very creepifying .


§ ita § - Jul 15, 2004 7:33:45 am PDT #4866 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

But Matt, most of the superworld falls into the category of "can't know" -- GL and Flash were there too until they horned in.


Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 15, 2004 7:38:04 am PDT #4867 of 10000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I'd actually agree that Kyle and Wally shouldn't have been told, based on their reactions and the type of outlook each has. But I don't think Diana would necessarily have reacted in a similar manner. If anything, she'd have pushed for a more final solution than the one they opted for .


CaBil - Jul 15, 2004 7:38:56 am PDT #4868 of 10000
Remember, remember/the fifth of November/the Gunpowder Treason and Plot/I see no reason/Why Gunpowder Treason/Should ever be forgot.

Of IC comments

Text: The only female character that I can think of at the moment that had a mundane husband was Donna Troy, but he and their kid bought it, right?

More text: I think the problem is that most female heroes do not have a mundane SO, with one or two major exception. Why? Because they very rarely had their own titles, and were introduced and featured as supporting characters in other titles, which immediately puts them a storytelling disadvantage. If you are going to kill off someone, it's not going to be the lead character (who is male) is will be his buddy or SO.

Some more thoughts I wonder if someone went back and did a study of how many buddies of superheroes die? For instance, in Hitman, virtually his entire male supporting cast was killed over the length of the series, some of them in horrific ways, but no one blinked.

Or is it the manner of death? Most buddies are killed in order to extract information while most SOs are killed to send a message/intimidate the hero. Is that what is offensive ?


§ ita § - Jul 15, 2004 7:39:15 am PDT #4869 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I thought the only people that knew were the ones that were right there, right then.


amych - Jul 15, 2004 7:40:49 am PDT #4870 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I thought the only

Yep, ita.


P.M. Marc - Jul 15, 2004 7:43:22 am PDT #4871 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Matt: the line you're thinking of is "Clark and Diana would never understand." Which I tend to agree with, because while I think Diana at least would understand if they'd just killed him, the particulars of what they did are pretty not-okay. As for "Oliver's overprotective chauvinism toward Dinah (which was immediately challenged, but still contributes to the overall mood)," I think I would have been bothered if Ollie hadn't acted as he did, because it would have seemed out of character for the post-Quiver Queen. Regarding "I'm really impressed with the the way the plot is being structured and laid out, but there's little in the world that's as sure to piss me off as the whole "the womenfolk are under attack, so the menfolk have to go get vengeancey" trope," I'm probably cheerfully reading too much into this, but I'm seeing IC as going to a place where it's exploring the ugly assumptions that dominated a lot of Silver Age stuff, even when it was trying to be progressive.


amych - Jul 15, 2004 7:45:02 am PDT #4872 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

re: your last, Plei, I very much hope so.


victor infante - Jul 15, 2004 7:45:35 am PDT #4873 of 10000
To understand what happened at the diner, we shall use Mr. Papaya! This is upsetting because he's the friendliest of fruits.

Ita's correct. Even Ralph was surprised, and it seems as if he may not have approved if he HAD known. I think the "woman in the refrigerator " complaints are extremely valid, but I'm enjoying the story immensely anyway.


P.M. Marc - Jul 15, 2004 7:46:13 am PDT #4874 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Also, Matt, IIRC they don't consult Ralph, either. Ralph and Sue are both gone when they make their decision. I totally want to see the fallout of all this in the Flash title, given Wally's recent actions and decisions WRT his own identity.