I may be misremembering, but I thought
the "conspirators" included Wonder Woman among the heroes they couldn't allow to know about the Dr. Light situation. Then there was the bit about Zatanna not liking the dishonesty (Puh-lease! The woman's whole career is built around deception and misdirection), and Oliver's overprotective chauvinism toward Dinah (which was immediately challenged, but still contributes to the overall mood)
.
Plus, I think
the fact that they have this big conflict about what has to be done about Dr. Light, but don't bother to consult Sue for input, is very creepifying
.
But Matt, most of the superworld
falls into the category of "can't know" -- GL and Flash were there too until they horned in.
I'd actually agree that
Kyle and Wally shouldn't have been told, based on their reactions and the type of outlook each has. But I don't think Diana would necessarily have reacted in a similar manner. If anything, she'd have pushed for a more final solution than the one they opted for
.
Of IC comments
Text:
The only female character that I can think of at the moment that had a mundane husband was Donna Troy, but he and their kid bought it, right?
More text:
I think the problem is that most female heroes do not have a mundane SO, with one or two major exception. Why? Because they very rarely had their own titles, and were introduced and featured as supporting characters in other titles, which immediately puts them a storytelling disadvantage. If you are going to kill off someone, it's not going to be the lead character (who is male) is will be his buddy or SO.
Some more thoughts
I wonder if someone went back and did a study of how many buddies of superheroes die? For instance, in Hitman, virtually his entire male supporting cast was killed over the length of the series, some of them in horrific ways, but no one blinked.
Or is it the manner of death? Most buddies are killed in order to extract information while most SOs are killed to send a message/intimidate the hero. Is that what is offensive
?
I thought the only
people that knew were the ones that were right there, right then.
Matt:
the line you're thinking of is "Clark and Diana would never understand."
Which I tend to agree with, because
while I think Diana at least would understand if they'd just killed him, the particulars of what they did are pretty not-okay. As for "Oliver's overprotective chauvinism toward Dinah (which was immediately challenged, but still contributes to the overall mood)," I think I would have been bothered if Ollie hadn't acted as he did, because it would have seemed out of character for the post-Quiver Queen.
Regarding
"I'm really impressed with the the way the plot is being structured and laid out, but there's little in the world that's as sure to piss me off as the whole "the womenfolk are under attack, so the menfolk have to go get vengeancey" trope," I'm probably cheerfully reading too much into this, but I'm seeing IC as going to a place where it's exploring the ugly assumptions that dominated a lot of Silver Age stuff, even when it was trying to be progressive.
re: your last, Plei, I very much hope so.
Ita's correct. Even Ralph was surprised, and it seems as if he may not have approved if he HAD known. I think the "woman in the refrigerator " complaints are extremely valid, but I'm enjoying the story immensely anyway.
Also, Matt, IIRC
they don't consult Ralph, either. Ralph and Sue are both gone when they make their decision. I totally want to see the fallout of all this in the Flash title, given Wally's recent actions and decisions WRT his own identity.