Powers Mark II? I'm only on collection #4, Hayden, so 'splain.
Other Media
Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.
Powers Mark II? I'm only on collection #4, Hayden, so 'splain.
Apparently, upon conclusion of the current arc, Bendis & what's-his-name the artist are going to take a break before starting a new volume from a different place. I've only read collection #1, so I don't know enough to comment further.
Umm, the current arc has been over for almost 4 months. New arc is starting up under Marvel's new Icon imprint in two months or so.
NovaChild, I only started reading Marvel comics last year, and recommend that you stay the hell away from Uncanny X-Men or anything else written by Chuck Austen, who strikes me as a no-talent assclown. I bought one of his books and sold it on eBay as soon as possible thereafter.
Unlike ita, I really liked Grant Morrison's run on New X-Men (conveniently collected in tpbs at this point, starting with E for Extinction) and have dug the hell out of the Ultimate X-Men (which I accept as having nothing to do with any other X-Men titles) and X-Statix (which is it's own clever can of worms and might as well be separate). I haven't read any other regular Marvel titles, though, and I'm not immersed in the backstory enough to care if a writer contradicts canon from 30 years ago.
Umm, the current arc has been over for almost 4 months. New arc is starting up under Marvel's new Icon imprint in two months or so.
D'oh! See post #3206 for my up-to-date knowledge of Powers.
Chuck Austen is a wildly uneven writer. His X-men has been bad, but that might be because of the ever heavy hand of the X-office editorial.
If you ever have a chance, find Superman: Metropolis, Chuck Austen's series focused on Jimmy Olson. Issue 7 has one of the most interesting character discussions ever between Jimmy and Supes, as Jimmy analyzes Supes love-life.
Well, I might look it up ('cause you've steered me oh-so-right before, CaBil), but, to tell the truth, I don't find Superman that interesting. Throw in Chuck Austen and I'm a bit scared.
is that Bendis is trying to pick up the next Great Leap Forward in comics that Alan Moore started in the 1980s, but has a tendency to get sidetracked into subpar storylines
He has a penchant for anticlimax.
Bendis & what's-his-name
Oeming.
I'm only on collection #4, Hayden, so 'splain.
Ooh, Supergroup? FG-3? That one's pretty cool. Anarchy is fun, too.
Just try that one issue then hayden. You can enjoy it without knowing anything else in that miniseries, and it reopens one perceptions about certain aspects to the Supes character.