You're talking to Serenity. And, Early... Serenity is very unhappy.

River ,'Objects In Space'


Other Media  

Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.


P.M. Marc - May 17, 2004 7:20:08 am PDT #2862 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

I think everyone looks misshapen with weird potato heads.

The only good thing I can say about the art in 92 is that at least it is not as bad as Bloodborne.


amych - May 17, 2004 7:27:33 am PDT #2863 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

the art in 92

Ack. Eww. Yeah. Horrid. I'd take the return of the clown-boy era over that.


Polter-Cow - May 17, 2004 8:18:56 am PDT #2864 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I think everyone looks misshapen with weird potato heads.

Ah. When I read in the comic book store, I speed-read, and can't take in the art style as much. I do like taking my time when I can, though.

Also: the prison is named Lockhaven? Hee hee.


amych - May 17, 2004 8:36:42 am PDT #2865 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Ah. When I read in the comic book store, I speed-read, and can't take in the art style as much. I do like taking my time when I can, though.

I tend to speed-read the first time or two (especially if I'm reading on the walk home from the comic store), and then go back and look at them more slowly. But then, I find that the more ways I read comics, the more different ways I appreciate them. I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents. I find that scanning comics (not that I would EVER do that), makes me see the art very differently than I do when I'm reading them normally -- pages as compositions, rather than panel-by-panel, and since I'm normally much more of a narrative whore than a visual person, that focus makes me really see the art in a way that I might not otherwise. Reading them on computer isn't quite the same as reading them on paper -- I'd have to think about just what the difference is there, but they definitely feel different.

So, yeah, I know the scan-quickly-in-the-store read. But the more re-reads the more obsessive merrier.


Polter-Cow - May 17, 2004 8:49:01 am PDT #2866 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents.

Did you see my big post? Cause I basically did the same thing. Although I at least did myself the favor of reading the three issues prior to the ouchie issue in order first.

I find that scanning comics (not that I would EVER do that), makes me see the art very differently than I do when I'm reading them normally -- pages as compositions, rather than panel-by-panel, and since I'm normally much more of a narrative whore than a visual person, that focus makes me really see the art in a way that I might not otherwise.

Taking my time causes me to become really fascinated by the fact that a comic is constructed of a series of still pictures, yet still implies the motion between them. And the psychology of splash pages and/or simply shocking panels. There was a panel in one of the Ultimate Six issues where Doc Oc telepathically shot out his prosthetic arms and impaled four people that almost literally caused my heart to skip a beat.

As for differing art styles, one only has to look at Jessica Jones in Alias, Daredevil, and The Pulse.


P.M. Marc - May 17, 2004 8:51:07 am PDT #2867 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents.

I hold you to blame for me doing this again yesterday.

Wanted to see how it worked now that we have 93.


Steph L. - May 17, 2004 8:51:34 am PDT #2868 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

that almost literally caused my heart to skip a beat.

I had that reaction in No Man's Land when the Joker shot Sarah Gordon. I *so* wasn't suspecting it.


amych - May 17, 2004 9:29:38 am PDT #2869 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I hold you to blame

::preen::


Polter-Cow - May 17, 2004 10:24:04 am PDT #2870 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I finished the Big Guns trade. The 80-page Giant figures into continuity because Hella blows up Ebersol, so Redhorn can return to his post as police chief.

I love all the names Babs has for Dick. Former Boy Wonder. Adult Wonder. Boy Heartthrob. Former Boy Genius.

The trade includes a cute Devin Grayson story where they run down all of Dick's past relationships. So, who's Donna? Starfire? Miggy? Emily is the one he married "for a case." And he also apparently had a fling with Huntress. And a couple dates with Clancy.

Now I'm hungry for more.


Michele T. - May 17, 2004 10:30:23 am PDT #2871 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Which one is the 80 page Giant, then?

The Huntress story is collected in the Grayson-authored Nightwing/Huntress TPB -- highly recommended, and my own entry into the canon.

Donna and Starfire are both Teen Titans -- Donna was Wonder Girl, and Starfire is Koriand'r (yes, apparently, named for the spice, according to one creator interview I read), an alien princess warrior blahblahblah.

Miggy, for the life of me, I can't recall. Some one-shot thing.