As she is female, there was some flirtation between 'em.

Heh. I picked up on the Dick Grayson, Man-Ho, vibe from practically the first panel I read. Which is why, in #93, the wrong broken (HOTT) rooftop sex didn't really ping me as wrong at first. But just at first.

Aren't all comic book women, by definition, hotties? They're drawn by men, after all.

Not when they are drawn by the guy who did #92.

Not when they are drawn by the guy who did #92.

Who was not hot in there?

I think everyone looks misshapen with weird potato heads.

I think everyone looks misshapen with weird potato heads.

The only good thing I can say about the art in 92 is that at least it is not as bad as Bloodborne.

the art in 92

Ack. Eww. Yeah. Horrid. I'd take the return of the clown-boy era over that.

I think everyone looks misshapen with weird potato heads.

Ah. When I read in the comic book store, I speed-read, and can't take in the art style as much. I do like taking my time when I can, though.

Also: the prison is named Lockhaven? Hee hee.

Ah. When I read in the comic book store, I speed-read, and can't take in the art style as much. I do like taking my time when I can, though.

I tend to speed-read the first time or two (especially if I'm reading on the walk home from the comic store), and then go back and look at them more slowly. But then, I find that the more ways I read comics, the more different ways I appreciate them. I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents. I find that scanning comics (not that I would EVER do that), makes me see the art very differently than I do when I'm reading them normally -- pages as compositions, rather than panel-by-panel, and since I'm normally much more of a narrative whore than a visual person, that focus makes me really see the art in a way that I might not otherwise. Reading them on computer isn't quite the same as reading them on paper -- I'd have to think about just what the difference is there, but they definitely feel different.

So, yeah, I know the scan-quickly-in-the-store read. But the more re-reads the more obsessive merrier.

I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents.

Did you see my big post? Cause I basically did the same thing. Although I at least did myself the favor of reading the three issues prior to the ouchie issue in order first.

I find that scanning comics (not that I would EVER do that), makes me see the art very differently than I do when I'm reading them normally -- pages as compositions, rather than panel-by-panel, and since I'm normally much more of a narrative whore than a visual person, that focus makes me really see the art in a way that I might not otherwise.

Taking my time causes me to become really fascinated by the fact that a comic is constructed of a series of still pictures, yet still implies the motion between them. And the psychology of splash pages and/or simply shocking panels. There was a panel in one of the Ultimate Six issues where Doc Oc telepathically shot out his prosthetic arms and impaled four people that almost literally caused my heart to skip a beat.

As for differing art styles, one only has to look at Jessica Jones in Alias, Daredevil, and The Pulse.

I read the recent NW arc backward when I went looking for good starting points, and it has a different punch starting with the big OUCH and working back into all the antecedents.

I hold you to blame for me doing this again yesterday.

Wanted to see how it worked now that we have 93.