Hey, if it means I don't have to read any more, woo and, might I add, a big hoo.

Xander ,'Sleeper'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Eddie - Jun 08, 2005 9:40:31 pm PDT #9938 of 10000
Your tag here.

Top Ten Fastest Natters:

Natter Title

Days Posts Posts/Day 7 We Need Natter 7 and We Might Take Yours

14.30 10012 700.24 1 Natter 1: Agnes Bertiz, we hardly knew ye

16.08 10024 623.41 10 X-treme Natter! We're trying this at home!

18.46 10011 542.30 6 Natter 6: We're wearing the cheese RIGHT NOW!!

18.78 10011 533.19 2 Natter: 2 Good 2 B 4 Gotten!

20.92 10022 479.15 4 Natter Free 4 All

21.27 10007 470.49 3 Natter 3: My Life and Times of Me, as Seen by Me

21.60 10008 463.36 9 Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ...

21.89 10003 457.01 5 Natter V. Natter

22.23 10005 450.09 8 Natter 8: 8, I forget what 8 was for

22.89 10007 437.22


Eddie - Jun 08, 2005 9:40:33 pm PDT #9939 of 10000
Your tag here.

Eddie - Jun 08, 2005 10:17:52 pm PDT #9940 of 10000
Your tag here.

Me again. Noticed a typo in the quote machine:

I already know what I'm gonna call her. Got a named all picked out...
Mal, 'Out Of Gas'

'named' should be 'name' of course


§ ita § - Jun 09, 2005 3:52:20 am PDT #9941 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Quote fixed.


Noumenon - Jun 09, 2005 5:40:39 am PDT #9942 of 10000
No other candidate is asking the hard questions, like "Did geophysicists assassinate Jim Henson?" or "Why is there hydrogen in America's water supply?" --defective yeti

Why are all the low-numbered natters in the top ten? Was Bitches not invented yet?


Jon B. - Jun 09, 2005 5:44:14 am PDT #9943 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I was wondering that too, but no, Bitches was here from day 1.


DXMachina - Jun 09, 2005 5:45:51 am PDT #9944 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Why are all the low-numbered natters in the top ten? Was Bitches not invented yet?

Bitches was there, and probably going just as fast. Bitches as a thread is older than Natter. We were probably just enthusiastic about the new board.


Kat - Jun 09, 2005 6:37:36 am PDT #9945 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Aren't those the top 10 natter threads, not the fastest of all the threads. Or did I skim it incorrectly?


Topic!Cindy - Jun 09, 2005 6:38:42 am PDT #9946 of 10000
What is even happening?

The top ten also are earlier Natter threads, Kat.


Kat - Jun 09, 2005 6:42:36 am PDT #9947 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Right. I'm not arguing about that at all. So we burned through the early natter threads at quite a clip. But we still liked each other, had shows to talk about and the board was all new and shiny. Remember how much fun it was to post and have the board be quick, especially after WX.

Of course we burned through those.

I'd imagine Bitches went faster in the early threads too.