Why are all the low-numbered natters in the top ten? Was Bitches not invented yet?
Bitches was there, and probably going just as fast. Bitches as a thread is older than Natter. We were probably just enthusiastic about the new board.
You have the emotional maturity of a blueberry scone.
Giles ,'Touched'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
DXMachina - Jun 09, 2005 5:45:51 am PDT #9944 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Kat - Jun 09, 2005 6:37:36 am PDT #9945 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Aren't those the top 10 natter threads, not the fastest of all the threads. Or did I skim it incorrectly?
Topic!Cindy - Jun 09, 2005 6:38:42 am PDT #9946 of 10000
What is even happening?
The top ten also are earlier Natter threads, Kat.
Kat - Jun 09, 2005 6:42:36 am PDT #9947 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Right. I'm not arguing about that at all. So we burned through the early natter threads at quite a clip. But we still liked each other, had shows to talk about and the board was all new and shiny. Remember how much fun it was to post and have the board be quick, especially after WX.
Of course we burned through those.
I'd imagine Bitches went faster in the early threads too.
Eddie - Jun 09, 2005 8:53:32 am PDT #9948 of 10000
Your tag here.
Ok, I'll do Bitches tonight for comparison's sake.
Just to clarify, those are the Top Ten Fastest Natter threads (not all threads) here at the Phoenix.
This is what comes from a combination of insomnia and randomly wondering how many posts per day is average for a Natter thread.
Polter-Cow - Jun 09, 2005 8:59:11 am PDT #9949 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Could you add dates to those Natters, so we could see if maybe there was specific stuff going on that may have contributed to excessive chattiness?
Jon B. - Jun 09, 2005 9:15:01 am PDT #9950 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
The dates are all listed in the archives.
bon bon - Jun 09, 2005 10:53:54 am PDT #9951 of 10000
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Natter X was fast b/c of the Oscars. I don't think Natter 7 has an explanation, unless it was post-Firefly weirdness.
§ ita § - Jun 09, 2005 11:05:29 am PDT #9952 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
ThreadDays Open
We Need Natter 7 and We Might Take Yours 15
Natter 1: Agnes Bertiz, we hardly knew ye 16
Natter 6: We're wearing the cheese RIGHT NOW!! 19
X-treme Natter! We're trying this at home! 19
Natter: 2 Good 2 B 4 Gotten! 21
Natter Free 4 All 21
Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... Natter 9 ... 21
Natter 3: My Life and Times of Me, as Seen by Me 22
Natter V. Natter 22
Natter 29: Got Title? 24
Natter 17 = 4² - cos(π): Nilly — Could This Be Mathier? 25
Natter 28 Days Later: Can We Have Zombies? 25
Spike's Bitches 4: Bite you in a heartbeat 27
Natter 12b: superstitious? us? 27
Spike's Bitches 11: Poncy Bugger Owes Me Eleven Po... 27
Natter 18: The Emotional Maturity of a Blueberry S... 27
Spike's Bitches 8: Big Gay Pirates 28
Spike's Bitches 12: Oh my god. Are we twelve? 28
Spike's Bitches 3: Is Everyone Here Very Stoned? 29
Natter 22: There's just one catch... 29
Natter 23: Blipverts are killing people. 29
Natter 32 Flavors and Then Some 29
Natter 33 1/3 29
Natter 20: Oh, as Usual, Dear... 30
Natter 15: Beware the Ides of Natter 30
Natter Elevenses: Let's All Get Ripped and Eat Swe... 31
Natter 21: Blackjack! 31
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR??!... 31
Natter 14: What number are we on? 32
Spike's Bitches 10: Haven't Had Quite Enough Jealo... 32
Kat - Jun 09, 2005 11:12:32 am PDT #9953 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I love ita for bring on the data.
God. What could we possibly had to discuss at that rate?