I can not see your tidy messages in gus.b
Aren't you an admin? I thought admins could see the messages. I could see Cindy's at b.net -- is that a bug?
As for the HTML content, I refreshed the screen, and the tidy message went away for post #3.
Looks like civilization finally caught up with us.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Dec 31, 2004 3:56:39 pm PST #9145 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 3:58:47 pm PST #9146 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
Oh, 'Gus' is not an admin. 'admin' is. I'll try that.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 4:06:57 pm PST #9147 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
Hmm. Just tried logging into gus.b as 'admin/[a thing about boots] ' and got rejected. Decided to look into into gus.b:BBaBB, anyway, and saw something that looked like duplicate posts at #'s 6 and 7.
It is getting scary up in here.
§ ita § - Dec 31, 2004 4:09:47 pm PST #9148 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I logged in as admin just fine, and posts 3, 6 and 7 all display the same, in order to test which generated the tidy message. However, 7 uses quickedits to achieve that end. Now, as admin, it tells me that post #1 was tidied.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 4:38:17 pm PST #9149 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
... Just read your #8. I am having trouble duplicating the problem. Obviously, there is some difference in content between refreshed and unrefreshed first posts.
This line is of interest:
$messages = tidy_get_error_buffer();
$messages contains more information than we are letting through to the user. If you can add $content .= $messages; above the if ( strpos($..., we might be able to see what is going on.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 4:43:49 pm PST #9150 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
ION: 'temporarily view this post' is not doing what it is supposed to in prod.
eta: "temp view" works when it is the only entry. If you pick a post in the middle of a long page to "temp view", there is no joy.
§ ita § - Dec 31, 2004 4:53:49 pm PST #9151 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
eta: "temp view" works when it is the only entry. If you pick a post in the middle of a long page to "temp view", there is no joy.
Has anyone else had this problem? I just tested it by blocking you and temporarily viewing each of your posts, and it worked just fine.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 4:57:33 pm PST #9152 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
Firefox 1.O, multipiped, Win2K. Definitely reproducible.
edit: Backing off. It only makes the single post visible. My bad.
§ ita § - Dec 31, 2004 5:00:07 pm PST #9153 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Never mind.
Gus - Dec 31, 2004 5:08:31 pm PST #9154 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
...although, it is confusing, that it goes back to the top of the page and you have to scroll down past a lot of entries from the same blockee, looking for the one post you thought might be of interest. Maybe a header:location that passes the postid on the $_GET would be good.
t if it gets in geekier up in here, there may be an implosion