Big chunk of discussion got chopped out, for me. What the hell is that?
My last post on that topic was:
What would we experience differently?
Someone drops a link to a book purchase into a discussion, let us say. I am reading this discussion as: The Buffistas preference would be that this link would be, more preferably, a pointer to the Buffistas affiliate link to that book purchase. There would be posts related to this preference. That is one difference.
Another difference could be visual. If there is a stack of vendor buttons somewhere around the site, there might be some conflict with the concept of we being fan-supported and fiercely independent.
I meant to say ... your post is in Bureau, Gus. (silly paste function)
I'm not saying any of those things, Gus. (and the place I wasn't saying it was in B'cacy).
There is nothing implicit in the "should we have affiliate programs" that has to change your user experience. However, if I know there's a link on the links page that means that b.org gets a cut every time I shop and B&N? Dude, I'm sure going to use it, instead of just typing bn.com into my browser window.
No skin off my nose, and a couple pennies to our coffers.
Wrong thread, bucko.
What an incredible nimrod am I? More at B'whatsit.
cereal:
ita, I don't see a production_post.php in ../classes. I do see a post.old.php. Am I good to go with the post.php that is in there?
Whoops. Saved it into the wrong test site. Gimme a couple mi...should be there now.
Hey, when someone's bored: RSS! It's a jolly good time. That is all.
~j
