What does the code for [continued] do when someone adds text during editing?
Right now, if I read the code right, nothing. But the automated code cuts you way shorter than our internally imposed limit, so it shouldn't come up often at all.
Olaf the Troll ,'Showtime'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
What does the code for [continued] do when someone adds text during editing?
Right now, if I read the code right, nothing. But the automated code cuts you way shorter than our internally imposed limit, so it shouldn't come up often at all.
t snickers at the geek-lust
What does the code for [continued] do when someone adds text during editing?
There is a an additional allowance of 2000 characters for the ammendment. The ammendment stays with the fragment. If the edited fragment exceeds 6000 characters (from the original 4K), it is brutally truncated.
Or, pretty close to what ita said.
Ok. I was just curious.
Gus -- your code didn't like this URL: http : //tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,271|91330|1|,00.htm
You spaced up the colon after 'http', so you could post, right?
Will test.
Yup.
It chopped it up and repeated it, so I commented out that code in production.
OK, got the problem. That site uses a pipe ('|') to delimit parms, in contravention of all standards and sense. It will be fixed despite my desire to adhere to the Godly Word of the W3C.
I've noticed pipe | being used a lot on sites lately. Is this a new fad?
I just wanted to pop over here and say a hearty thank you to the board developers for making b.org so damned user friendly and easy to read. Black boards and so very eye-strainy.
So thanks.