Err, as Jess mentioned in Natter...
s - (lowercase "s"followed by a space at the start of a line) creates spoiler or white font text to the end of the current line.
We've got one.
I can hurt a demon!! That's right. I'm back. And I'm a BLOODY ANIMAL!
Spike ,'Showtime'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
P.M. Marc - Oct 14, 2004 6:27:46 am PDT #8374 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Wolfram - Oct 14, 2004 6:28:36 am PDT #8375 of 10000
Visilurking
>We've got one.
Does s work with >?
Apparently not. I think that's what DCJ wants.
P.M. Marc - Oct 14, 2004 6:30:25 am PDT #8376 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
No, you have to choose one or the other, like all the quick-edit tags, as quick-edit tags are dependent on the tag being at the start of the line. There's no nesting.
Wolfram - Oct 14, 2004 6:32:06 am PDT #8377 of 10000
Visilurking
Is it possible to make a quick-edit tag that invokes the html code of an s> combo?
ETA: I'm not saying I think it's necessary or that we should do it, I'm just curious if it's possible.
DCJensen - Oct 14, 2004 6:40:17 am PDT #8378 of 10000
All is well that ends in pizza.
No, you have to choose one or the other, like all the quick-edit tags, as quick-edit tags are dependent on the tag being at the start of the line. There's no nesting.
The point I was trying to make, is that when you are quoting someone else's whitefont, and adding your own, it all starts to run together.
It would be nice to be able to have the quoted text indented *and* whitefonted.
Even worse is quoting someone who is weaving in and out of spoiler font.
Jon B. - Oct 14, 2004 6:44:09 am PDT #8379 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
You can use the t blockquote tag after an s quickedit. More to type than a combo quickedit, but doable.
§ ita § - Oct 14, 2004 6:46:08 am PDT #8380 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Or a t font color=white after a > indent. But I think the point was to not have to.
DCJensen - Oct 14, 2004 6:49:04 am PDT #8381 of 10000
All is well that ends in pizza.
You can use the blockquote tag after an s quickedit. More to type than a combo quickedit, but doable.
Yes, that's why I proposed a quickedit, to avoid having to do that and stopping to do t blockquote and t /blockquote every time slows things down.
Isn't that one of the points of quickedits, to cut down on possible HTML mistakes, as well as making for faster posting?
ETA: or what ita said. I had to slow down to add the blockquote tag fakes...
Topic!Cindy - Oct 14, 2004 7:21:23 am PDT #8382 of 10000
What is even happening?
I think nesting quick edits would be lovely, but problematic. What would be the difference (coding-wise) between the word "it" and an italicized fake tag, or the difference between "bi" and quick edit nesting for bold and italics?
§ ita § - Oct 14, 2004 7:23:57 am PDT #8383 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Quickedits need to be one character. It would be adding to the list of quicktags, not changing how they operate, if I read DCJ's request right.