Maybe.
Basically, I made a change to eliminate the double post numbers, and that happened, and I haven't been back.
Xander ,'Help'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Maybe.
Basically, I made a change to eliminate the double post numbers, and that happened, and I haven't been back.
Huh. Clearly, it's not an Issue.
Haven't we still had the occasional double post #? I thought I saw one recently.
Much fewer than before, with increased volume. It's not perfect, and short of switching to a triggered database, I don't think it's worth sweating over.
Might as well get the Issues taken care of first.
Haven't we still had the occasional double post #? I thought I saw one recently.
I saw a triple the other day, but the times were all different. The first two were a second apart, I think. The third was a few seconds later. I diserember what thread, so this probably isn't helpful in and of itself. Should we still report them? I just accepted this one as a blip. I didn't want to bother anyone with it.
I saw a triple the other day, but the times were all different.
We're talking about two posts with the same post id #, not the same content. Is that what you're referring to?
Yes. It went something like (Made up numbers, but...)
Post #1191
Post #1194
Post #1194
Post #1194
Post #1195
The first two of the triplet were only a second apart, but then the third was a few more seconds behind.
There was some screwy numbering at the start of the current natter thread (blipverts). Everything was effed with closing out the thread and starting a new one. Anyway, yes, identical post #s at different times.
Lookee here:
Sean K "Natter 22: There's just one catch..." Apr 6, 2004 2:43:23 pm PDT
9996
9998
9998
9999
10000
10002
10002
10004
10004
Resulting from the end-of-thread everyone-posting-at-once wackiness....
Minearverse had three 10000s. Still the coolest.
(Two different kinds of number-slutting in the same hour. Huh.)