Haven't we still had the occasional double post #? I thought I saw one recently.

I saw a triple the other day, but the times were all different. The first two were a second apart, I think. The third was a few seconds later. I diserember what thread, so this probably isn't helpful in and of itself. Should we still report them? I just accepted this one as a blip. I didn't want to bother anyone with it.

I saw a triple the other day, but the times were all different.

We're talking about two posts with the same post id #, not the same content. Is that what you're referring to?

Yes. It went something like (Made up numbers, but...)

Post #1191
Post #1194
Post #1194
Post #1194
Post #1195

The first two of the triplet were only a second apart, but then the third was a few more seconds behind.

There was some screwy numbering at the start of the current natter thread (blipverts). Everything was effed with closing out the thread and starting a new one. Anyway, yes, identical post #s at different times.

Lookee here:

Sean K "Natter 22: There's just one catch..." Apr 6, 2004 2:43:23 pm PDT

9996
9998
9998
9999
10000
10002
10002
10004
10004

Resulting from the end-of-thread everyone-posting-at-once wackiness....

Minearverse had three 10000s. Still the coolest.

(Two different kinds of number-slutting in the same hour. Huh.)

The to-do list has an item for "design Stompy image". What is wanted for that? Something cartoon-y, or a label similar to the org logo, or what?

Gus, it was proposed here in Am-Chau Yarkona "Buffistas Building a Better Board" Mar 20, 2003 6:22:29 am PST and the bureaucracy discussion started around John H "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Mar 19, 2003 4:02:41 pm PST .

Thanks, Nilly. Oh, and ... insent.

John H. did a rough of a nice image, and it's still here.