As currently coded/designed, you can block or unblock from a post of the person your blinvisibiliating.
I remember a suggestion that it be like a toggle on each post.
Jayne ,'The Message'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
As currently coded/designed, you can block or unblock from a post of the person your blinvisibiliating.
I remember a suggestion that it be like a toggle on each post.
It's in the user profile screen right now
Aha. I missed it because I checked the profile screen with no one MARCIEd. Which makes me think the section should always be there, even if it says you have no one blocked.
As currently coded/designed, you can block or unblock from a post of the person your blinvisibiliating.
Yeah, makes sense for the blocking, but I still think it'd be handy to have a list available. Especially for people who are fairly quick to use the feature -- you're annoyed by someone, you plonk them, you cool down later, and you don't necessarily want to go back hunting for their posts. Plus, easier to keep track of who/how many are on your list. If it has to be a future thing, that's cool.
edit: never mind!
you can block or unblock from a post of the person you're blinvisibiliating.
How does the unblocking work, if they're blinvisible? Is there name still visible, but the text of the post blinvisible?
Yes.
What did we make MARCIE stand for again?
Minearverse Anti-Riling Creative Irritation Eliminator
Well, that's what we're calling it now.
Question re: cookies.
I set my security options to Disable from Prompt for cookies that are stored on the system. b.org has never asked to put a cookie on the system. When I set the system to Disable, my system hung twice while trying to come to b.org. When I set it back to Prompt, b.org popped right up, without asking to put a cookie on the system. I know b.org keeps track of me somehow so it knows to remember me, but I'm not sure if I confused the thing by Disabling the cookies. Of course, it could be coincidence. I'm running Win98SE with IE 5.5.
It uses cookies, yes.