Do you guys need to take the trouble to accomodate non-posters? No one here has complained of trouble, and we're not exactly reticent when it comes to that.

I say, they want to piggyback on our content while snotting about shit that's really easy? Screw 'em.

I say, they want to piggyback on our content while snotting about shit that's really easy? Screw 'em.

Yup. I think my new motto is going to be "What would Jaye do?"

It took me a couple of days to get used to this board style, coming from that cascading thread style of discussion, but I'm so used to it now, I find the cascading thread style distant and impersonal.

in love with Shawn.

writing up a challenge to Bob.

Do you guys need to take the trouble to accomodate non-posters?

Maybe they're non-posters because they couldn't work out how to get around.

Perhaps, but where do you limit usability concerns? The universe of possible users or...the users?

Maybe they're non-posters because they couldn't work out how to get around.

I'd just as soon they lurked for a bit and got the hang of thangs before they they posted.

It's an incredibly clean and easy-to-navigate board. I vote: don't mess with what's working.

Maybe they're non-posters because they couldn't work out how to get around.

you know what, I'm ok with that. I don't want to try to be the board for everyone. If they don't like this set-up , there are other set-ups. If there are specific problems, then I'd think they would email an admin about them, or ask in a thread.

where do you limit usability concerns?

I don't think you limit them by saying you don't care about decorating for people who couldn't find the front door.

I think you limit them by a) standards of interface design b) alienating current users.

Which does leave room to play.