Buffy ,'Potential'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Mayhaps that's where the host is coming from.
And that makes even more sense.
I guess I'm just worried because that seems to indicate that we'll never have a home of our own. I mean, if that's going to be the case here, and everywhere we go, how will we ever solve our problems?
They met on AIM with Kristen several times, trying to solve the problem. I'd host a site with them, if I were using a different code. It just seems to be the MySQL that's stuck in their bellies. Or, I'm on crack, because i really know JACK CRAP about coding.
Somewhere We'll find a new way of living We'll find a way of forgiving Somewhere There's a place for us A time and place for us Hold my hand And we're halfway there Hold my hand And I'll take you there Somehow Someday Somewhere
Well, I think Fangeek now has enough info for us to be able to say to a host, "these are our problems, can you help us?"
I understand both Nutty's metaphor, and Allyson's, and even accept it. Here comes the but... But, I see Sean's point. What I would like to understand (and perhaps this is out there, and I already should understand it) is the following.
Does IH (that's our ISP, right?) already know the stuff that Tom Scola seems to have just discovered, and if they do, are they refuting it? Perhaps (and if this isn't possible, fine) if we contacted them with this (what seems to me to be) new information, they wouldn't feel we were so problem-childish, and would have a forehead slapping moment of, "Oh! So that's the problem. Yes, we'll just push these 5 buttons here. All set now."
Who is our host, now?
Rob, what do you make of the inability to open two mysql command line connections at once?
I think we've leaked all but one of our allowed connections and we're sharing it. The command line host keeps a connection open permanently, so while you were using it there were no more connections available to use.
That's just a guess, I have to dig down into the MySQL source code again to find out just how max_user_connections is enforced.
I think we've leaked all but one of our allowed connections and we're sharing it.
If that's the case, then they should be showing up in the SHOW PROCESSLIST query.
I think we've leaked all but one of our allowed connections and we're sharing it.
Problem is (well, okay, a bunch of problems) that 24 hours off, and the 99 connections didn't unleak.
So as bad as our code may be -- mysqld is bogarting like crazy.
If that's the case, then they should be showing up in the SHOW PROCESSLIST query.
Unless it's just a counting error, not an actual active connection.
I'm looking at the source code now so soon I won't just be guessing.