Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
To-do list
September 22, 2003, 3:09 am Elena[14]: ERROR [2] mysql_connect(): User bufforg_phoenix has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections line 77 of file /home/bufforg/public_html/classes/giles.php There has been an error. It's of the type we call fatal. Please don't be scared. You're not the one that's going to die.
And the most recent one (assuming I don't get one while trying to post) was at 3:20am board time.
That's 7-7:30am AST. There's no way we have that many people logged in. Is there something malicious going on?
September 22, 2003, 3:49 am Sophia Brooks[58]: ERROR [2] mysql_connect(): User bufforg_phoenix has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections line 77 of file /home/bufforg/public_html/classes/giles.php
I just got one too, at 6:49 Eastern
September 22, 2003, 3:49 am Sophia Brooks[58]: ERROR [2] mysql_connect(): User bufforg_phoenix has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections line 77 of file /home/bufforg/public_html/classes/giles.php
I just got one too, at 6:49 Eastern
ERROR [2] mysql_connect(): User bufforg_phoenix has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections line 77 of file /home/bufforg/public_html/classes/giles.php
There has been an error. It's of the type we call fatal. Please don't be scared. You're not the one that's going to die.
Okay, where the $$&#&(@#& are the developers?
All the cool kids get this message, right?
All the cool kids get this message, right?
Huh. If I'm getting it, does that mean I'm cool?
BTW, in case I didn't say it before, this is how it will be from now on. If we go over, we get that handy dandy, and yes annoying, error message. As opposed to flying way way over and getting yanked.
I actually can't take credit for it. It was as much of a surprise to me that they implemented it as it was to you guys.
Kristen, did they say when they implemented it? Because if they did it a while ago, and we've been fine til now, then it has to be external.
If it is external, can we track who's making all these extra connections?
I'm looking at this page with the following URL:
http://www.buffistas.org/showthread.php?thread_id=32&post_id=4991
The page is displaying only posts 4994, 4999, 5002, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 5011, 5014, 5015, 5018, 5019, with 5019 being the last post.
The page is displaying only posts 4994, 4999, 5002, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 5011, 5014, 5015, 5018, 5019, with 5019 being the last post.
Many of us have tried to submit posts, only to have it fail during the "post message" process. The thought above, is that if it fails after the number is assigned, the post still doesn't get posted, but the board considers that number assigned.
Someone said it better upstream, Jon. I think it was Liese.
eta...
Take this post, and yours, for instance. I had to try to submit it four times before it was posted. The post number is 5025. Your post number is 5021.
Jon, we've been getting "too many connections" errors. When the error hits while someone is trying to post, the database increments but doesn't record the post, so we're getting a lot of gaps.
Should we go to peoplesforum for awhile and see if it still happens?