I've noticed it happening a couple of odd times ita.
You turned evil a lot faster than I thought you would.
Angel ,'Just Rewards (2)'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Sue - Mar 13, 2003 8:35:29 am PST #3475 of 10000
hip deep in pie
Elena - Mar 13, 2003 11:06:06 am PST #3476 of 10000
Thanks for all the fish.
Yeah, every once in a while I get it too.
Consuela - Mar 13, 2003 11:30:33 am PST #3477 of 10000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
And me. Thought it was a minor glitch not worth mentioning, or that, you know, it was just me...
Connie Neil - Mar 13, 2003 2:52:43 pm PST #3478 of 10000
brillig
I am Consuela. I just shrug and move on.
DXMachina - Mar 14, 2003 4:26:41 pm PST #3479 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Whoa. It just happened to me, with no duplicate post number.
I've seen it too.
Not seeing the favicon in Mozilla 1.2.1, even after clearing the cache.
msbelle - Mar 14, 2003 8:14:15 pm PST #3480 of 10000
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Where are we on the list? I miss search.
John H - Mar 14, 2003 9:32:47 pm PST #3481 of 10000
Search is a big issue.
The reason is, if ita will forgive me, that there's a built-in way to make databases easily searchable.
But our using that built-in method seems like it was one of the reasons behind the big crash of February.
But that built-in way is the most efficient way. Any other way would almost certainly create just as many problems.
§ ita § - Mar 14, 2003 9:35:16 pm PST #3482 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What do you mean, exactly, John? Are you referring to full text? It's less load than LIKE. The key is making the search more efficient -- not presenting all the results on one page, yadda, yadda.
And I'll get to it.
John H - Mar 14, 2003 9:38:57 pm PST #3483 of 10000
What do you mean, exactly, John? Are you referring to full text?
Yes, sorry if I mis-represented the situation -- I thought you'd said earlier that fulltext searches were part of the thing that crashed the board before.
§ ita § - Mar 14, 2003 9:44:23 pm PST #3484 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, it was fulltext searches, but any multiple searches that returned 1100 hits a shot from going through post contents would have crashed the server -- fulltext just not as soon as LIKE.