Jon, I can't instantly deactivate a poster. The tweak I tried didn't work.
That's going to have to be a modification.
John -- I know I've been unable to get to pre-Phoenix Buffistas at least once because of a connectivity issue on their end. Which I was sure of because it turned out another discussion board I frequented was hosted by the same people.
To be honest, I haven't paid much attention.
For personal use, I'd say Hostrocket is just fine. For an application like this which gets almost 24/7 use, you want to do what you consider reasonable in the way of increasing redundant hardware and connectivity, which takes you out of most standard hosting packages.
That's going to have to be a modification.
Does my idea of having a "logout" button on the edituser page make sense?
It should be unnecessary. Deactivating should log out the user. I just have to work out how to end someone else's session from the server side.
We can't just delete users?
I mean, we want to keep, but deactivate, people who're being shunned, but people who try to register as "FUCKERS!!!" -- if ita's not around, what happens?
Deactivating should log out the user.
Yep. That makes a lot more sense.
t edit
or what John said. There's no reason to keep certain people on the database so why not just delete them?
You do to FUCKERS!!!!! exactly what I did to FUCKERS!!!!! -- deactivate it.
Deletion risks breaking referential integrity. There are two ways around that -- moving all posts from a deleted user to "DELETED USER" (which I don't like), or not allowing deletion of posters who've actually posted. Which is fine, but who but us admins knows about the deactivated never-posted users?
Also -- once a user is deleted, that e-mail address can be used to register again. And that user name.
ita's right again. I think. I should just go to bed.
OK, so when someone's de-activated by an admin, while they're logged into the board, and posting, what happens? What happened when mieskie came up with another username and posted? Did his session stay open?
