Sorry, I should have said.
The links like the number-link, edit and delete and mark and whatever in the header.
'Potential'
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Sorry, I should have said.
The links like the number-link, edit and delete and mark and whatever in the header.
Got it. That is correct.
Look where ww.buffistas.org goes. Is this fixable? Yes, I am a stupid typo-head.
Huh. Dunno. Will look into that.
Any domain that doesn't exists gives that result.
[link] for instance. Though I'm sure that's been reserved for future use...
Hi, some of us in Literary were just talking about a music thread, and someone said she thought it had been discussed before but not implemented for some reason not known to us. So I'm an emissary on the subject. Has it come up before?
One user's comments while I'm here: I like to understand acronyms and terminology. 'Download' or 'save' are explanatory. Not until y'all got into specifics of implementing 'threadsucking' did I finally figure out what it IS. It sounded like an advanced search function to me. Also, 'sucking' is vulgar, not that vulgar is necessarily bad but it does makes me recoil a little when I see it because I don't expect it in a computer function.
But this really was a music thread Q.
Also, 'sucking' is vulgar, not that vulgar is necessarily bad but it does makes me recoil a little when I see it because I don't expect it in a computer function.
"Suck" is no more inherently vulgar than "blow." They are unique verbs that as such are used in vulgar contexts. "Threadsuck" is not related to those contexts.
"Threadsuck" sets off my vulgarity sensor. And "Threadblow" would to. For some reason, "Download" doesn't. I guess I'm just funny that way.
I'm with Shawn.
Well, threadsuck isn't vulgar in context if you already know what it means. It isn't obvious.
What Rob said.
Music?