I don't think it ever worked differently. Any tag you open is theoretically effectively closed by the t /p from two hard returns. But why are the remaining verses in a new font size?
Xander: I do have Spaghetti-os. Set 'em on top of the dryer and you're a fluff cycle away from lukewarm goodness. Riley: I, uh, had dryer-food for lunch.
'Same Time, Same Place'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 1:44:38 pm PST #1287 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
John H - Nov 08, 2002 2:01:56 pm PST #1288 of 10000
OK I hereby volunteer myself as a collector and as a coder for the buffydb, and I think all the cool kids will want to do one or the other or both, right?
Re: collecting? Ple's already baggsed Wesley, right? Or do we say dibbsed? In that case I want to adopt Faith! Also Willie. I have a soft spot for that guy.
Nobody really needs to claim Buffy, because she's in every ep, but even Buffy, Willow and Xander have had their doubles and their twins and their doppelgängers, so maybe "Twins, etc of main characters" is a category for someone to adopt?
Re: coding? If we think we've already mapped out the structure of the database, we need to start thinking about functions.
We need "edit person", as discussed, so that we can tick Joss as writer, director, composer, etc on an ep-by-ep basis.
What else do we need? "Edit Episode" of course, to put in synopses and snarkage. Does any registered member get to add their own snark to an episode?
What about the voting thing we talked about before?
Just throwing the ideas out there...
John H - Nov 08, 2002 2:04:59 pm PST #1289 of 10000
Can someone link to the discussion of structure from before? Was it in the Bad Old Days on WX or what?
billytea - Nov 08, 2002 2:05:15 pm PST #1290 of 10000
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Re: collecting? Ple's already baggsed Wesley, right? Or do we say dibbsed?
Depends if she's claiming collection rights, or already has him trussed up in is basement struggling against his constraints (which, if she's had him there for a while, is by now probably just for show).
P.M. Marc - Nov 08, 2002 2:07:59 pm PST #1291 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
That would make my basement so much more interesting...
t /natter
I can collect the Danny Strong data, too.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 2:08:10 pm PST #1292 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It was on WX, which is down.
P.M. Marc - Nov 08, 2002 2:22:58 pm PST #1293 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
I may have saved some of it to my local machine. I'll check when I get home.
Jon B. - Nov 08, 2002 2:26:45 pm PST #1294 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
But why are the remaining verses in a new font size?
An excellent question for which I have no answer. You'd think they'd all use the browser default, but the open t pre tag is causing all sorts of zany behavior.
Can someone link to the discussion of structure from before? Was it in the Bad Old Days on WX or what?
I remember ita posting a lovely diagram of the structure, which was promptly eaten by a WX outage later that night.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2002 3:04:20 pm PST #1295 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jon B. - Nov 08, 2002 3:08:22 pm PST #1296 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Getting back to the problem of IDing when someone's tag is more than 255 characters, I just spotted this script in a email newsletter I get. It's pretty nifty, though it may be overkill. Interestingly, it seems to count the carriage return as two characters, which is what we wanted. I'm confused as to why it's doing that since it's using the same length method as what I was testing with before.