Mal: Well, look at this! Appears we got here just in the nick of time. What does that make us? Zoe: Big damn heroes, sir.

'Safe'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Michele T. - Nov 03, 2002 9:39:30 pm PST #1158 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

The problem with JS tends to be that people use it for actual important functionality, and don't provide alternate methods to do the same thing. This is a minor piece of frippery, and not anything anyone needs to use the board, so although I think JS is a mostly-bad idea, I don't see any problem with this except the question of where it should go on the edit profile screen so it'll be clear and not cluttery.

ETA: ita and I have much the same general sentiments about Javascript, just phrased differently.


John H - Nov 03, 2002 9:39:42 pm PST #1159 of 10000

Let's just make sure the anti-javascript contingent doesn't have a problem with it

The trick is that the button itself is written with JavaScript, so, by definition, anyone who doesn't have JavaScript will never see it.

I haven't tested on Netscape and Mozilla and whatever. What did you look at it with?

Oh, and ita, would anything weird happen on submission of the form, now that it's got a new input? I don't think so, but we could always make it a text/image link, not a button, if that was a factor.


§ ita § - Nov 03, 2002 9:45:15 pm PST #1160 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

John, as long as none of the original elements are altered, the form should be just fine.


Jon B. - Nov 03, 2002 9:48:01 pm PST #1161 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I don't see any problem with this except the question of where it should go on the edit profile screen so it'll be clear and not cluttery.

I like John's placement on his sample page: [link]


Michele T. - Nov 03, 2002 9:51:58 pm PST #1162 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

That should work, though you may want to see if we can get the explanatory text closer to the text-entry box to make it clearer what goes with what.

Actually, as I'm typing this, I'm wondering instead about using a button image that more closely resembles the "post message" one. Different sorts of tasks, sure, but a consistency about what a button looks like can be good as well.


John H - Nov 03, 2002 9:54:47 pm PST #1163 of 10000

I just did minor tweaking -- Netscape 2 hated it, so I made it three-and-above only.

If you refresh now Jon, you can see the latest version between "start" and "end" comments for your cut-and-pasting pleasure.


Jon B. - Nov 03, 2002 9:55:44 pm PST #1164 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I agree about the button, but that would require a fancier javascript function. John's uses the default button that required no special coding.

I just tested it on Mozilla, Netscape 4.7X and IE, all on Windows ME, and it seems to work in al of them. My only aesthetic concern is that the button is kinda big in IE.

t edit Whoops! Didn't get John's newest mod. Back soon.


John H - Nov 03, 2002 9:56:52 pm PST #1165 of 10000

I'm wondering instead about using a button image that more closely resembles the "post message" one.

Sensible. As I said, it can be a button, an image or even a text link.

What we also need is the wording. "There are x chars in the tagline box. You have a problem."? Boring -- anyone got something a little more Buffistalike?


Jon B. - Nov 03, 2002 10:00:43 pm PST #1166 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

For the test version I was working with, I used:

  • Danger Will Robinson! There are n characters in the tag field.

and

  • You're five by five, B! There are n characters in the tag field.


John H - Nov 03, 2002 10:05:41 pm PST #1167 of 10000

I don't love the first one, (grew up without Lost In Space, in rural England. Issues.) but that's the general idea.

Should it perhaps say "...you're only allowed 255" or is that too much fuss?