from my recollection: they were doing Heroes in 2 parts. So I think the second set of eps will start airing in February or so...?
The Mayor ,'End of Days'
Heroes 1: We Could Be Heroes
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the show and ancillary materials such as web comics! Anything that's aired in the US (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though -- if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. Chuffa, Chuffa!
On the whole, much, much improved.
Oh, totally. I enjoyed last night's episode, probably because we only saw Suresh for a head-turn and Claire not at all. Also, all of the stupidity from Present Day Heroes was missing, they killed the criminally-stereotyped African seer (man this show is tough on white-eyeballed folks) and they skipped over what could have been another awful Hiro/hero mission of chasing down Arthur Petrelli.
But it didn't feel to me like there was any time (according to this ep) in between PP's death and HRG getting into Mohinder's cab. Which so obviously and blatantly contradicts the pilot that I'm willing to chalk it up to shitty continuity editing.
Which is what I'm saying. Leaving aside the question of captioning, which, again, may well have been awful) it seems obvious, from the interspersed bits of things we've already seen, that we weren't meant to think all of this was happening at the same time.
"One year earlier" in the beginning is clear. "Six months earlier" halfway through the ep is not - six months earlier than when we just were, or six months earlier than the show's present time?
OK. Granted not terribly clear, but does it matter much? Viewers like us know full well that, say, Nathan's car crash and Claire's train wreck (no, not West) are six months apart, and this story doesn't contradict that. It might be misleading if you've never seen an episode before, but really, if you've never seen an episode, you wouldn't much care.
Granted not terribly clear, but does it matter much?
It matters to me. I don't particularly want to spend my time watching a show which doesn't seem to value competent storytelling. If last night's ep had been executed better, we wouln't have to be having this conversation in the first place.
Somebody remind me, is Eric Roberts' character still alive in the present day timeline? I think it's also a sign of the bad storytelling that I can't remember his character's name, for that matter.
I couldn't remember his name or basically anything about his character. But now it's coming back to me!! Bennet kills him really awesomely at the end of season one.
It matters to me. I don't particularly want to spend my time watching a show which doesn't seem to value competent storytelling. If last night's ep had been executed better, we wouln't have to be having this conversation in the first place.
Fair point, but I have to say, I didn't have any trouble following it whatsoever.
Bennet kills him really awesomely at the end of season one.
Yep, he has kind of an ugly end, but HRG was badass in dishing it out.
And WTF makes Nathan think his father committed suicide???
OK, I missed this entirely - or was that what Nathan thought season 1?
Continuity? What continuity?
We don't need no stinkin' continuity!