I happen to be very biteable, pal. I'm moist and delicious.

Xander ,'Bring On The Night'


Spike's Bitches 34: They're All Slime and Antlers  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 01, 2007 6:32:41 am PST #8122 of 10001
What is even happening?

Yeahl lisah, but we were just discussing your errors in judgment in LJ. Besides, everyone knows musicians are on the drugs.


Hil R. - Mar 01, 2007 6:32:58 am PST #8123 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Oh, and both Random House and American Heritage agree with me.


Deena - Mar 01, 2007 6:33:35 am PST #8124 of 10001
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

But does Oxford American?


Laura - Mar 01, 2007 6:34:29 am PST #8125 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

Can we just take this to a jello pit?


Hil R. - Mar 01, 2007 6:35:20 am PST #8126 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Columbia Guide to Standard American English:

Publicly is the usual spelling; publically does occur, but rarely in Edited English.


juliana - Mar 01, 2007 6:36:16 am PST #8127 of 10001
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

Timelies!!

Much ~ma for Matt & Nora & whomever else.

do you like publically or publicly?

"Publicly", though my inner 12 year old giggles every time I see it.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 01, 2007 6:37:26 am PST #8128 of 10001
What is even happening?

Oh, publicly is valid spelling. It's just not right.

Besides, some random guy on the internet agrees with me:

‘Publicly’ is surpassed only by ‘subtlety’ as English's most abominable word. But whilst we're lumbered with the latter, for the former we have a fine and upstanding alternative in ‘publically’. Or we would do if the word wasn't so unfittingly maligned—a fate we can, thankfully, spare it with just a brief look at the history of the word and the logic behind its use.
In 1567 the adverb ‘publikely’ first made its appearance. It stayed that way for about a century until ‘publiquely’ and ‘publickly’ arose in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The form ‘publicly’ didn't make its appearance until 1855, nearly three hundred years after the first form. Sixty-five years later, we shifted once again to ‘publically’. It was Edith Sitwell who gifted it to us.
But in so-called edited English, ‘publicly’ remains standard. Why? Because of the usual pernicious mixture of prescriptivism and ignorance. Spelling became fixed in English when ‘publicly’ was at the zenith in its vogue, and the simple combination of adjective + "-ly" suffix seems eminently logical. But neither spellings nor meanings are ever entirely fixed in language, and moreover ‘publicly’ isn't as logically consistent as it may first appear.
The OED, after stating that "-al" is often used to form secondary adjectives, notes a cornucopia of adverbs that no longer have their "-al" counterparts. The adverb, it says, "is almost always in -ically even when only the adj. in -ic is in current use, as in athletically, hypnotically, phlegmatically, rustically, scenically." And you can add to that asyndeton my own canonical retort of ‘basically’, as in "publicly is basicly an abomination". Please, let publically be.

Continues here: [link]


Hil R. - Mar 01, 2007 6:38:40 am PST #8129 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Hmm. Though another google search counters my "publical isn't a word" argument with "basically." [link]

edit: hee. x-post


Deena - Mar 01, 2007 6:39:42 am PST #8130 of 10001
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

I agree with everything he said except for his slam on subtlety. I like that word.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 01, 2007 6:40:54 am PST #8131 of 10001
What is even happening?

I do too, Deena. I do always have to stop and think about the spelling, though.