I think individuals saying what boils down to the same thing is more effective than a calming phrase say-in because it shows that we're not bots - that everyone individually was offended and is trying to restore order. I don't know, for me that's a lot more respectful than being told to talk to the hand (which I agree is what the effect of a CPSI would be).
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'm against it for most of the reasons already stated, and also because if I'm that pissed, parroting an agreed on phrase isn't going to make me any less pissed, and if I have to wade through 25 or so of the same post? I'm going to start avoiding threads.
As it stands, at least I can get the occasional giggle from the variety.
Again, the phrase isn't to calm. It's to register dissent and move on.
People don't want to just scroll by. This is an alternative.
We're really going to have to agree to disagree on this one, Trudy, because I feel very strongly against this, either in terms of me applying it to other people or in terms of having it applied to me.
Unified behavior? Among the Buffistas? I don't think you'll ever get that.
I can sort of see where you're coming from, Trudy -- although I can also see the opposition -- but I don't think it's practicable. Even when we all know and like and want to follow the rules, sometimes something just pops out (like a spoiler or an insult). Imagine how much harder it would be, trying to maintain the Official Calm Down You Loony Mantra List, who's on it, when we should use it, keeping everyone informed not to respond to the inflammatory posts of So-and-so...
I can't see it even working in terms of what would be posted, much less in terms of being effective on the user we're annoyed with.
While I agree with Trudy that the tone of the responses to Zoe has gotten out of hand, I think her solution is inappropriate. I think that multiple generic & identical comments is not only frustrating for the target of said posts, it also fails to identify the *specific* point of frustration for the senders.
It's more like tourretts
What is "it," pray tell? This presumed unnamed disorder? How can we possibly know what it presents as when we have no idea what it is, or if it even exists? Can we please stop trying to diagnose the woman?
Anyhow, we're pretty much just giving her what she wants, so can we warn her and have done with it? She knows the thread is here. She's probably sickly pleased at the damage done.
At this point, I don't care what her motivation is, if it's boredom or mental illness or what.
I have no more slack to cut.
Again, the phrase isn't to calm. It's to register dissent and move on.
What about the proposition that it will inflame?
Alright, the dog has grown opposable thumbs and hooked on her own leash. The sun is out, I have to leave for the theater in 45 minutes, and the thumbs look weird. I gotta go.
::MWAH::
Yes Fay, my paragraph is very wordy! I'm better at editing other's words than my own.
Oh, it was a nice paragraph! I liked it. I just think that in this instance it's pitched all wrong, because communication is the crux of the problem. Big words and complex sentences wouldn't help, imho.