A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
do you mean not multi-ballot, but questions that have more than two answers, in other words, questions for which we might need to hold a run-off, or use the preferential method to count?
I thought we had decided to leave this up to the discretion of the proposer. Which makes the most sense to me.
I thought we had decided to leave this up to the discretion of the proposer. Which makes the most sense to me.
'Kay. The new Dobblerized!Wolfram is very agreeable.
I don't know if we decided it. I think either Jesse or Sophia mentioned it way back. I think it sounds like a decent idea, though.
I didn't mention it, I don't think, but I do like it. Look, we're never going to all agree, so why not switch it up?
However, smart proposers will propose a yes/no question with their preferred answer being yes. Because we've passed everything so far.
That's Burrell's Law of Buffista Ballots.
eta...
In all seriousness, things have passed because we made a list of things a lot of us wanted and then voted on them, not just because we're lemmings.
In that case, I propose that we should all be recognized as the paragons of intelligence and beauty that we truly are, and should forthwith be showered with money, love, and parking spaces.
In that case, I propose that we should all be recognized as the paragons of intelligence and beauty that we truly are, and should forthwith be showered with money, love, and parking spaces.
Is that a multiple choice ballot?