Mal: Well, look at this! Appears we got here just in the nick of time. What does that make us? Zoe: Big damn heroes, sir.

'Safe'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


DXMachina - Nov 25, 2002 11:12:49 am PST #860 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

You know, I now remember how I knew that we had mailing list capabilities. It's because I use the admins mailing list. Duh!!!

Is it the weekend yet?


Cindy - Nov 25, 2002 12:22:02 pm PST #861 of 10001
Nobody

Fred, Shawn - I heard back from the bronzer attorney. She did some poking and says that it usually boils down to libel, so I either heard it from someone else originally, or made the whole damned thing up. Sorry for the confusion.


brenda m - Nov 25, 2002 12:59:28 pm PST #862 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Changing my vote. Buffy 2: Hey, I've Died Twice.

But shouldn't that be for Buffy 3?


DXMachina - Nov 25, 2002 1:06:07 pm PST #863 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Stop being all logical and stuff!


Cindy - Nov 25, 2002 2:57:15 pm PST #864 of 10001
Nobody

Well, that's originally why I put it as "Hey she's died twice" - but I still think the "I've" is better.


§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:00:47 pm PST #865 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Why does that need to be for the third thread, again? I thought it was being selected on the virtue of us having died twice, and it referring to the number two to boot.


Dana - Nov 25, 2002 3:02:35 pm PST #866 of 10001
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."

Because Buffy herself is now Buffy Mark Three. But I can see it being the source of confusion.


§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:07:56 pm PST #867 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Yeah. I think that's more confusion than it's worth, using it for #3. It's not like we've been terribly meaningful with all the numbers (Angel 8 His Father, Mother, Sister, and Entire Village, anyone?).


Michele T. - Nov 25, 2002 3:30:43 pm PST #868 of 10001
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Eight = "Ate"! It's a very dumb joke, but it's meaningful.


§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:32:56 pm PST #869 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I mean the number eight was in no way meaningful in the sentence. Much like twice is there to trigger two, but not to actually refer to the twiceness of Buffy's death, thereby implying three Buffys which is a whole lot of meaning right there.