Well, that's originally why I put it as "Hey she's died twice" - but I still think the "I've" is better.
Oz is the highest-scoring person ever to fail to graduate.
Willow ,'Him'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Cindy - Nov 25, 2002 2:57:15 pm PST #864 of 10001
Nobody
§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:00:47 pm PST #865 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Why does that need to be for the third thread, again? I thought it was being selected on the virtue of us having died twice, and it referring to the number two to boot.
Dana - Nov 25, 2002 3:02:35 pm PST #866 of 10001
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
Because Buffy herself is now Buffy Mark Three. But I can see it being the source of confusion.
§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:07:56 pm PST #867 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Yeah. I think that's more confusion than it's worth, using it for #3. It's not like we've been terribly meaningful with all the numbers (Angel 8 His Father, Mother, Sister, and Entire Village, anyone?).
Michele T. - Nov 25, 2002 3:30:43 pm PST #868 of 10001
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
Eight = "Ate"! It's a very dumb joke, but it's meaningful.
§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 3:32:56 pm PST #869 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I mean the number eight was in no way meaningful in the sentence. Much like twice is there to trigger two, but not to actually refer to the twiceness of Buffy's death, thereby implying three Buffys which is a whole lot of meaning right there.
DXMachina - Nov 25, 2002 5:08:32 pm PST #870 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Huh, my e-mail program decided that my "WELCOME to somervillains@buffistas.org" e-mail message was possible spam. Heads up to anyone else who signs up to the list.
§ ita § - Nov 25, 2002 5:10:33 pm PST #871 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Which e-mail program is that?
DXMachina - Nov 25, 2002 5:25:26 pm PST #872 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Pocomail 2.6. Not a mainstream program by any means, but most everything else that gets put into the spam box is spam.
Kat - Nov 25, 2002 6:01:47 pm PST #873 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
ita, could we move the LAista list?