I want to marry Nutty.
And fourthed, although I sort of kind of think it can be added to what is under vote now?
Angelus ,'Damage'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I want to marry Nutty.
And fourthed, although I sort of kind of think it can be added to what is under vote now?
Seconded for Betsy's.
What are we seconding, exactly?
One Lightbulb topic at a time, or grandfathering pre-vote decisions?
grandfathering.
I was seconding grandfathering pre-vote decisions. I didn't see an actual proposal for one Lightbulb topic at a time; I thought that was already implied.
We're seconding Betsy's grandfather.
or grandfathering pre-vote decisions?
This, I think. So once we establish the waiting period it will apply to decisions arrived pre-voting by consensus. That seems fair.
Okay, then I second too. Or, whichever number we're up to by now.
But we can't Lightbulb it for another week, right?
Right. One proposal in the Lightbulb at a time.
No offense but its barely been 5 hours since I've proposed the war thread, and even if it gets a fourth, it's now two weeks away from discussion and three weeks away from the end of a ballot under the current one discussion at a time proposal. (Notwithstanding it getting mooted by this second proposal - although "decided" needs to be defined.) This is the kind of irrational thinking that we were doing away with in the first place by structuring a formal system. Am I the only one who thinks reasonableness should be a necessary factor here?