Seconded for Betsy's.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
What are we seconding, exactly?
One Lightbulb topic at a time, or grandfathering pre-vote decisions?
grandfathering.
I was seconding grandfathering pre-vote decisions. I didn't see an actual proposal for one Lightbulb topic at a time; I thought that was already implied.
We're seconding Betsy's grandfather.
or grandfathering pre-vote decisions?
This, I think. So once we establish the waiting period it will apply to decisions arrived pre-voting by consensus. That seems fair.
Okay, then I second too. Or, whichever number we're up to by now.
But we can't Lightbulb it for another week, right?
Right. One proposal in the Lightbulb at a time.
No offense but its barely been 5 hours since I've proposed the war thread, and even if it gets a fourth, it's now two weeks away from discussion and three weeks away from the end of a ballot under the current one discussion at a time proposal. (Notwithstanding it getting mooted by this second proposal - although "decided" needs to be defined.) This is the kind of irrational thinking that we were doing away with in the first place by structuring a formal system. Am I the only one who thinks reasonableness should be a necessary factor here?
Right. If I just just codified the rules we were consensing on, no point in breaking them already.
Edited to add: but Wolfram, (a) this is an uncommon circumstance, since we're still working out the kinks of the system; and (b) not being able to get a fourth for your proposal might be a sign that it's not ready for the Voting Thread yet. Try it again next week, or in two weeks, and maybe you'll get the seconds you need.