No, I don't -- I'm just saying that the very name of TWoP, at this point, provokes a shudder and a cry of "unclean! unclean!" from more than a few Buffistas, and so it's not a good place to be holding up as an example to be followed, you know?
Anya ,'Dirty Girls'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
And you think that we'd do that?
No, I don't. I just think that using TWOP as an example might make some people have unpleasant associations (since they stomped jengod). So I wanted to make sure that we didn't have those.
And I guess, today, that Michele and I are the same person.
Real trolls aren't a threat to community Zen, because they manage to build a great consensus against themselves.
Haven't you ever encountered a troll with patience, one who gets in and tries to destroy from there? I have, and I am not currently sure we'd survive one.
I don't mean to get all paranoid, and perhaps troll is a misleading term, because I've seen it also happen when an established member of a community gets all Angelus with some Yoko Factor thrown in for fun.
I just hope we're strong enough for that, is all.
As for empowerment? I'd barely trust myself with the power. I don't think it's us, for good or for ill. Salon worked, as much as it did, because they were a company with employed Stompies. Similarly, TWOP has the authoritarian framework to do that. I dunno, we're too busy acting egalitarian to go there without doing damage in the process -- pre-emptive damage, at that.
Allyson, I gather that what you like about the TWoP system is that it is a no-muss, no-fuss, no-drama sort of system, correct?
Yep.
I don't mean to get all paranoid, and perhaps troll is a misleading term, because I've seen it also happen when an established member of a community gets all Angelus with some Yoko Factor thrown in for fun.
This is the only way I've ever seen it go down. And it's nasty.
I think there are some people here who might. I don't think 98% of the people would, but there are certainly some who I could see going overboard.
I think that could be worked against by the E.P.s having to discuss what they did amongst themselves, and by cycling people through the role on a relatively short term.
I don't think it's us, for good or for ill.
And I don't think what Bureaucracy has turned into is us, and I can only see it getting less-us if there isn't some actual enforcement of community standards.
I could never do the job, not with the debates. I could shut someone down who came in shrieking obscenities and laying waste, I could do that in a cold second. But once debate enters the equation, I start seeing the other person's side and wanting to engage and try to get them to see the possible error of their ways. I'd make a great hit man, taking out strangers at a distance. Once I see them as a person, though, I'm all "Can't we all just get along?"
I've seen it also happen when an established member of a community gets all Angelus with some Yoko Factor thrown in for fun.
Yep, me too. That's what destroyed the last Buffista-like community I was a member of.