I don't think there is, ita. There are 2 options (well, three, but whiffle got quite rightly stomped). Either we stay consensual, and we discuss each case on it's merits, or the Stompy Feet become really Stompy. I reckon our current approach, which combines the two, is the only workable one.
Dawn: I thought you were adequate. Giles: And the accolades keep pouring in. I'd best take my leave before my head swells any larger. Good night.
'First Date'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Jim - Mar 19, 2003 7:42:27 am PST #7957 of 10001
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!
Anne W. - Mar 19, 2003 7:48:58 am PST #7958 of 10001
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.
If this teeny not-quite-a-troll can cause this much damage, what happens if a real troll shows up?
Well, a real troll did show up, IIRC--some Dark Angel fan who made a series of taunts about Firefly's cancellation. I think that spotting and dealing with a jackass of that nature is relatively easy.
It's the people who are more subtle in their trolling that will be harder to manage, IMO. I'm talking about people who like to poke the board with a verbal stick to stir up trouble, but who to their shit-disturbing in a way that allows them to state that they didn't mean to start any trouble.
ita, how would you define a "real troll," just out of curiosity?
Lyra Jane - Mar 19, 2003 7:50:47 am PST #7959 of 10001
Up with the sun
If this teeny not-quite-a-troll can cause this much damage, what happens if a real troll shows up? Can we be prepared? Is there anything we can do without damaging the community?
I think the thing to do is to ride it out and have a good sense of humor, personally. Let it go. Accept that some people were just raised by wolves. Use your mental M.A.R.C.I.E. filter, and do not respond even if (ESPECIALLY if) your blood is boiling.
Because you know what? This is the Internet. Nine times out of 10, it Isn't Worth It to get into a stupid fight that will ruin your day and provide a little safe danger to some jackass in Indiana. It's not your job to educate and correct the behavior of everyone else-- you can only control yourself.
And if everyone does this -- if no one engages -- what you have is one lunatic talking to himself, and probably not having very much fun doing it.
It's harder in the short term to not respond, I know (and yes, DNFTEC IS responding. It shows that they're getting to you.). But long-run, it's healthier.
Lyra Jane - Mar 19, 2003 7:54:42 am PST #7960 of 10001
Up with the sun
ita, how would you define a "real troll," just out of curiosity?
Not ita, but answering. To me, a real troll is someone who posts only to cause ill feelings or a fight, who never contributes anything but dischord. And who has fun doing this.
§ ita § - Mar 19, 2003 8:11:26 am PST #7961 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
ita, how would you define a "real troll," just out of curiosity?
I don't have a clear definition, but ... from USENET, from TT, it's someone who's there to disrupt or destroy, quite on purpose. Not even someone who wants to change the community to match their own ideals, or who's abrasive and impatient, and doesn't have the same degree of civility to which we strive.
Some bust in like the Dark Angel person, others do it slower. I don't think we've had a persistent example of one yet, and I wonder if m/S/A can cause this much strife, how we'd deal with someone clever and bent on destruction.
And no, I don't mean technologically, or even rules-wise. I mean as people, and as a community.
I don't see much of an opening to change the rules -- but that's because I can't think of any better ones. I don't want power shifted, and I don't think we can outline enough scenarious without leaving our knickers showing somewhere else.
I'm just sad that the reverberation is still being felt, although I don't want to tell anyone they shouldn't be feeling what they're feeling. That would be absurd.
Mostly I hope we would be strong enough to resist or deflect any real onslaught that may come our way.
Jesse - Mar 19, 2003 8:11:46 am PST #7962 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
OK, so I just googled myself, and have a request: Can my last name come out of the FAQ? Thx.
Rebecca Lizard - Mar 19, 2003 8:13:30 am PST #7963 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket
Thank you for that post, Cindy.
Jessica - Mar 19, 2003 8:15:36 am PST #7964 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
I don't see much of an opening to change the rules -- but that's because I can't think of any better ones. I don't want power shifted, and I don't think we can outline enough scenarious without leaving our knickers showing somewhere else.
This is how I feel.
DXMachina - Mar 19, 2003 8:24:37 am PST #7965 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
OK, so I just googled myself, and have a request: Can my last name come out of the FAQ? Thx.
I fixed the old Geocities FAQ. Jon or ita need to to the Phoenix FAQ.
Theodosia - Mar 19, 2003 8:27:24 am PST #7966 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"
FWIW, sometimes a hypothetical question is exactly the means I use to recast a situation and get a handle on what bothered me/didn't bother me/where I draw the line. I'm sorry if my hypothetical comes in the middle of a lot of others, but it was a small thought that I didn't see that anybody else had posed, and it showed me an important distinction in the overall wrongness of m/S/A's conduct.