I noticed that the thread lists in the FAQ need to be updated. It doesn't list all of the WX threads, and has some long closed threads as still being up and running.
I don't give a good gorram about relevant, Wash. Or objective. And I ain't so afraid of losing something that I ain't gonna try to have it. You and I would make one beautiful baby. And I want to meet that child one day. Period.
Zoe ,'Heart Of Gold'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Elena - Sep 18, 2002 4:40:19 pm PDT #73 of 10001
Thanks for all the fish.
jengod - Sep 18, 2002 4:45:49 pm PDT #74 of 10001
That thing is so big now it might deserve it's own page off the FAQ.
Jessica - Sep 18, 2002 5:19:13 pm PDT #75 of 10001
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
Since we have the Old Threads Home (and no longer have to defend our thread-proliferation to other TTers) do we even need it at all?
Elena - Sep 18, 2002 5:23:32 pm PDT #76 of 10001
Thanks for all the fish.
We probably don't need it... But I do like having the start and finish dates and, because I don't like to work these things out for myself, how long the threads lasted.
Jessica - Sep 18, 2002 5:25:26 pm PDT #77 of 10001
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
The current Archives have the start-finish dates. I don't think it would be too difficult to add the running times, but I also don't want to volunteer DX for more work, so I should probably let him answer.
DXMachina - Sep 18, 2002 5:31:20 pm PDT #78 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Running times shouldn't be a problem. I have a drenload of threadsucks that I have to zip and put up, so I'll be working on the archive anyway.
Angus G - Sep 19, 2002 8:22:19 am PDT #79 of 10001
Roguish Laird
I'd be in favour of a politics thread; I'm presuming flame-free doesn't mean vigorous-disagreement-free, and I think a thread where the conversation was a bit more robust than Natter would actually be quite good. (Although it would probably end up being mostly American politics, but I can live with that.)
sumi - Sep 19, 2002 8:26:17 am PDT #80 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
I've got a question: when I click on message center shouldn't I get a list of only those threads I'm subscribed to?
But no - I got the Atlantic Monday Madness thread - - I'm SOOO not subscribed to that!!!
Is that the way it's supposed to work?
Jen - Sep 19, 2002 9:00:37 am PDT #81 of 10001
love's a dream you enter though I shake and shake and shake you
I'm presuming flame-free doesn't mean vigorous-disagreement-free
Correct. I just won't stick around in a thread where my beliefs are belittled--I consider that a flame. Disagreed with? Bring it on. *g*
Sue - Sep 19, 2002 9:07:16 am PDT #82 of 10001
hip deep in pie
But no - I got the Atlantic Monday Madness thread - - I'm SOOO not subscribed to that!!!
Hey! Do I smell?