I think some professional competitions do it that way. Also, I can't speak for how long Olympic-eligible has used the present system. I've been a serious fan since the mid 90's, so that's all I'm absolutely sure of.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Susan -- That anonymous system you described boggles me. I am boggled. Shake me up and look for words.
I tend to agree with Billytea (doin' the secret actuary handshake). I think we should be as inclusive as possible, so I'd prefer 2-100 over 10-65.
As long as every one understands that FIFTY IS THE CORRECT ANSWER, I don't care what the range is for MVT voting.
That anonymous system you described boggles me. I am boggled. Shake me up and look for words.
Most fans are boggled, and while the skaters are trying to be diplomatic, we think they are, too. There's even going to be an official No Secret Judging protest at Worlds at the end of the month, with some pretty savvy PR types from the fandom shepherding it.
It is not at all surprising to me that I agree with Jesse!
2-100 makes more sense to me too.
Me and you, Sophia. Co-Rulers of All Buffistadom. It could work!
Co-Rulers of All Buffistadom. It could work!
Two rulers? How would you break a tie?
Preferential voting, duh.
There would be no ties! We both know the One True Answer.