Edit to "will either have to vote preferentially or have one or more runoff elections".
Fair enough. I will edit.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Edit to "will either have to vote preferentially or have one or more runoff elections".
Fair enough. I will edit.
How many Buffistas does it take to make a vote count?
Is it me, or did anyone immeadiately wonder how many Buffistas it takes to change a light bulb?
And, John, now I understand what you meant about not wanting to bring something up unless you know it can be voted upon. That makes sense.
However, I could say that just bringing something up in here is no assurance it's going to be voted upon anytime in the next decade.
True, but you don't know that going in, so you need a system ahead of time to deal with that (somewhat likely) contingency.
Well, but that's exactly what my vote proposal was about, wasn't it? The vote that I proposed meant implicitly: "in the event of 3 or more choices, would you mind if the most voted choice was the winner?" (And if yo do mind, pick one of the other two).
Is it me, or did anyone immeadiately wonder how many Buffistas it takes to change a light bulb?
That's in the FAQ.
i.e. (A) means that in the rare cases where a ballot question has more than two choices, you will have to vote preferentially (and I still promise to write up a clear explanation of the system).
It doesn't mean that, though. People could say that something should win ONLY if it's the MAJORITY of people's first choice. If votes are more evenly spread, nothing happens.
Bureaucracy II: Screw Kafka, we're talkin' Beckett.
People could say that something should win ONLY if it's the MAJORITY of people's first choice. If votes are more evenly spread, nothing happens.
Oh Jesse! Always making things complicated! ;)
Paul - Is that what you meant? Because I'm still not understanding how your (1) is exclusive of (3).
A lot of people weren't considering voting systems or ballots with more than one cholce on them at all. Or they might be happy with lots of runoffs.
And at least some people not only do not mind, but are good with letting the most votes win, whether it's a 50%+1 majority or not. Some people are fine with the Pick One - Now Which one got the most method.
That's in the FAQ.
And it's pretty fricken hilarious. There was that part about force-feeding a lamp electrons, or setting it on fire.
Bureaucracy II: No Exit.