"let's all agree with what the cool kids"
Wow. I find that incredibly insulting. And now I'm walking away.
'Conviction (1)'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
"let's all agree with what the cool kids"
Wow. I find that incredibly insulting. And now I'm walking away.
Yeah. Because we've finally snapped. No, seriously. At least for me.
FOURTEEN PEOPLE. FOURTEEN.
Fourteen people what? In this thread, or on the board, or...?
I just need some context, sorry.
"Cool kids" was a poor choice of words (sorry, Gar), but I agree with his sentiment. I believe that the original proposal made a zillion posts ago to have four more questions that would settle the issues of Votor Turnout, number of seconds, etc., and to use preferential balloting just this once before we debated it to death (too late!), was simple. It's the endless meta-debate on the subject that's made it seem complicated.
I read it as "the examples I have are too controversial to even bring up."
That's exactly what I was saying.
I'm cool. But I live in Ohio and my house heats like big barn with open windows.
Hmm...maybe that's not what you meant.
Fourteen people what? In this thread, or on the board, or...?
I just need some context, sorry.
DX did a threadsuck and counted, and 2/3rds of the 1500 posts on this issue have been posted by 14 people.
Actually, as a relative newcomer, I consider all of those who were in favor of preferential voting as "cool kids". Or at least that's how I have them categorized in my mental Buffista who-is-who.
That's exactly what I was saying.
Ok, so why snark at me for understanding you? I'm caught between offended and baffled here.
FOURTEEN PEOPLE. FOURTEEN.
But this is EXACTLY why I think we need an easy way for people to contribute, and to me that way is voting If only 14 people really care about discussing all this shit in all of this great detail, it's important to me that everyone else has an opportunity to have some impact without having to quit their jobs to read this thread. I don't want community decisions made by 14 people, even if I am one of those 14 because I am unable to keep my big mouth shut.
I believe that the original proposal made a zillion posts ago to have four more questions that would settle the issues of Votor Turnout, number of seconds, etc., and to use preferential balloting just this once before we debated it to death (too late!), was simple. It's the endless meta-debate on the subject that's made it seem complicated.
Want to put it again, Jon?