And you're sure this isn't just some fanboy thing? 'Cause I've fought more than a couple pimply, overweight vamps that called themselves Lestat.

Buffy ,'Lessons'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


John H - Mar 04, 2003 2:01:33 pm PST #6693 of 10001

If it's something too sensitive to even mention, then perhaps we don't want to devote 4 days of discussion to it, ever.

See Kat's posts before, with which I heartily agreed. There are things too sensitive to mention? For who? That way lies the Tyranny of the Easily Upset.


David J. Schwartz - Mar 04, 2003 2:02:28 pm PST #6694 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

I think John has a very good point. What are we talking about here, exactly? I mean, sock colors are a fine example, but point to nothing specific. Is this all about thread proliferation, or are there other things being discussed?


P.M. Marc - Mar 04, 2003 2:03:55 pm PST #6695 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

See Kat's posts before, with which I heartily agreed. There are things too sensitive to mention? For who? That way lies the Tyranny of the Easily Upset.

See Party Comma Cocktail.

Frankly, I'd rather have the Tyranny of the Easily Upset than the Tyranny of the Obnoxious Blowhards, push coming to shove, and it would.

And, speaking as an Obnoxious Blowhard, that's saying something.


Typo Boy - Mar 04, 2003 2:04:32 pm PST #6696 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Uh I hope you understand that keep it simple is not just a matter of "let's all agree with what the cool kids" want. We don't have to discuss preferential voting to death - but it seems to me that at least enouigh people favor to make it worth voting on the question. And it is not that complicated. All it does is, in the rare cases where there more than two choices required, give people a chance to say what their second choice is in case their first choice does not win. No one has to give a second choice. Then peoples list of favortes, second favorites and so on, help us determine who would win a run-off if no option is first choice of a majority. Not complicated. The arguments against it are complicated.

And I will say there has been at least as much endless blabbing from the keep it simple crowd as from everyone else. It seems that some of this is what ita proposed as a thread title - "everybody shut up and agree with me".


Dana - Mar 04, 2003 2:05:41 pm PST #6697 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Uh I hope you understand that keep it simple is not just a matter of "let's all agree with what the cool kids" want.

I swear to god, the next time someone uses a phrase like "cool kids", "higher status", or "I'm not a true Buffista", I'm going to start a campaign to bring Riley back. I mean it.


David J. Schwartz - Mar 04, 2003 2:06:35 pm PST #6698 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

Uh I hope you understand that keep it simple is not just a matter of "let's all agree with what the cool kids" want.

Oh, good. This argument again.

Walking away now.


Anathema - Mar 04, 2003 2:07:36 pm PST #6699 of 10001
Jonathan Will Always Be My Hero

I would very much like to hear what people think are the serious issues that demand voting. The reason I was never in favor of voting in the first place was because it seemed to me that things run well here already. The only regular decisions are thread naming, or thread creation, and I haven't seen a lot tsuris over those issues. Although I can also understand wanting to have a system in place to decide those things, it seems as if the cure is worse than the disease at this point.

What other decisions are there that make this voting thing so important?

methinks this anathema guy still doesn't understand the definition of "lurk"


John H - Mar 04, 2003 2:07:38 pm PST #6700 of 10001

I'd rather have the Tyranny of the Easily Upset than the Tyranny of the Obnoxious Blowhards

Am I an OB, Plei? I thought I was more of an obnoxious blow-soft.

This is just becoming to cutesy for words, but what if the Easily Upset are too easily upset to deal with the question of throwing out the Obnoxious Blowhards? That way we get the worst of both worlds.


Jesse - Mar 04, 2003 2:08:13 pm PST #6701 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Is this all about thread proliferation, or are there other things being discussed?

Off the top of my head? Thing that have actually come up? Troll policies, spoiler policies, user feedback (wuffie thing).

I really really feel like if we can get to a place where we have a procedure for decision-making, there really aren't that many decisions to be made. At this point. It's just that the "procedure" we had was making people unhappy.


P.M. Marc - Mar 04, 2003 2:08:29 pm PST #6702 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

And I will say there has been at least as much endless blabbing from the keep it simple crowd as from everyone else. It seems that some of this is what ita proposed as a thread title - "everybody shut up and agree with me".

Yeah. Because we've finally snapped. No, seriously. At least for me.

FOURTEEN PEOPLE. FOURTEEN.

And, FWIW, I was #15. I asked. But I hear there was a large gap between 14 and 15 in terms of numbers.