Saffron: I'll die. Mal: Well, as a courtesy, you might start getting busy on that, 'cause all this chatter ain't doin' me any kindness.

'Trash'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


scrappy - Mar 04, 2003 10:57:18 am PST #6558 of 10001
Nobody

Oh yeah? I am 110% in favor.


§ ita § - Mar 04, 2003 11:00:13 am PST #6559 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

scrappy, don't make me come over there and prove my 100% is bigger than your 110%.


Connie Neil - Mar 04, 2003 11:00:54 am PST #6560 of 10001
brillig

What's the worse case scenario if we don't have everything polished and approved and lined up and approved by everyone before the vote? We have to do a referendum on a couple of minor points? The horror.


Jessica - Mar 04, 2003 11:04:17 am PST #6561 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Really, a group of officers should be elected to a set time period.

There are not words to express how much I dislike this solution.

"this [arms stretched wide apart] much" and "more than you can possibly imagine" are the ones that come instantly to my mind.

It seems to me that we're insisting on the 100% perfect solution every time, and that the pursuit of perfection is getting in the way of closing discussion and getting things done.

Yes. This.

Let's not keep breeding ducks to nibble us to death here.

We had ONE issue to decide, and that's "how many are the minimum number of voters?"


Typo Boy - Mar 04, 2003 11:05:39 am PST #6562 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

But I did not withdraw a proposal ita made. I withdrew my suggested amendment. Look three points:

1) I made a proposal to be helpful It was not found helpful. I withdrew it.

2) But given how this whole process has gone I won't accept rudeness. I really want an apology from Anthama for the "dicking" comment.

3) And I'm withdrawing because I am convinced it was a bad idea ,not because it violates process. First of all, seconding in our system (which has not been passed in any case) does not rule out amendments. Formal presentation does that (an announcement in of the vote) does that. And I will point out that an improvement in wording was in fact made after it was proposed and seconded. So what I wanted to do was perfectly within the process of how we are doing it. And we are violating our own process by having the vote start at midnight tonight. I see the need, and I'm not pushing it. but please don't use "violation of process" arguments in this particular discussion.


Burrell - Mar 04, 2003 11:05:42 am PST #6563 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

Since I feel I've been mischaracterized, I want to clarify. When I suggested that we hold off for a week, I wasn't trying to shut down discussion because I was uncomfortable. All I could see was anger and frustration and talking in circles in every direction & to me that's unproductive. Well, it's productive if what you want to produce is more posts, but that's about it.

We are overthinking. This is not a government. This is not a science fiction convention. This is a party. A large, diffuse cocktail party.

God, yes! I'd also say we are taking ourselves way too seriously, but I'm sure that will piss people off again. So pretend I didn't say it.

So when someone proposes something and is seconded, having to then get through a round of debate over the damn proposal is not remotely democratic. Discussion is what you do before a proposal is made. But once someone decides they want to make a formal proposal, all that's left is to have an appropriate amount of people second that proposal as is, then you vote.

Perhaps but, er, I don't think that's what we voted to do. I could be wrong. I thought we voted to propose changes, discuss for 4 days, and then vote. But whatever.


Jessica - Mar 04, 2003 11:06:11 am PST #6564 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

So when someone proposes something and is seconded, having to then get through a round of debate over the damn proposal is not remotely democratic. Discussion is what you do before a proposal is made. But once someone decides they want to make a formal proposal, all that's left is to have an appropriate amount of people second that proposal as is, then you vote.

We voted to have 4 days of discussion before a vote. We've had 2 on this issue so far.


Connie Neil - Mar 04, 2003 11:07:32 am PST #6565 of 10001
brillig

Good lord, two more days of this? No one's going to be speaking to anyone.


Gandalfe - Mar 04, 2003 11:09:27 am PST #6566 of 10001
The generation that could change the world is still looking for its car keys.

I do not want to get into preferential voting right now. The discussion on what the hell that means seems to need to continue, if it's an option. Because about 5 posters are convinced they grok it.

Well, then, frankly, if it can't be explained in a way that the majority of the voters don't get it/like it, it probably gets voted down.


Anathema - Mar 04, 2003 11:10:05 am PST #6567 of 10001
Jonathan Will Always Be My Hero

Typo, the dicking around comment was not directed at you. It was directed at the process in general, which has seemed to devolve into endless dicking around on proposals that should be voted upon.

And I regret posting. Sorry. I have tried ever so hard to stay out of this discussion, but I saw people getting very upset so I tried to see if I help get things back on task. Probably that was a mistake. And I will go back to staying out of things.