Depends upon whether you want them in your message center or not. If you've read all the messages, they'll never pop up in read new.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
So The Archives are only for non-Phoenix threads (unlike those of WX)?
[Edit: I mean, if I understand it correctly, in WX the archives were needed in order to prevent the finished threads from being deleted, which is not a problem here, right?
Not asking for anything, of course, just wondering how things work]
I'll need to finish writing the threadsuck before those threads can be added to the archive.
And ita rocks again. Thanks!
Interesting point. I doubt that keeping the old threads around in the main area affects performance, but after a while, the main page will look rather cluttered. I think that once we've gotten a threadsuck utility going, we'll start to archive old Phoenix threads.
t spooky x-post with ita
You should also keep yourself subscribed to Natter 1 and 2 so that the search function will search them when you search your subscribed threads.
Interesting point. I doubt that keeping the old threads around in the main area affects performance, but after a while, the main page will look rather cluttered.
Yeah, that was my point. And I was just thinking about the Set Profile page and what it'll look like when we're up to Natter 29 again.
[edited because-- personal pronouns! sometimes they're useful!]
We need a new line in the FAQ's ita entry:
Oh, and she's a moon in the Firefly universe.
Ita Moon!
FYI: Out of 339 users that signed up, 215 have posted, and 14 never managed to validate.