You should also keep yourself subscribed to Natter 1 and 2 so that the search function will search them when you search your subscribed threads.
Take me, sir. Take me hard.
Zoe ,'War Stories'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Noumenon - Oct 27, 2002 10:36:46 am PST #637 of 10001
No other candidate is asking the hard questions, like "Did geophysicists assassinate Jim Henson?" or "Why is there hydrogen in America's water supply?" --defective yeti
Rebecca Lizard - Oct 27, 2002 11:23:30 am PST #638 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket
Interesting point. I doubt that keeping the old threads around in the main area affects performance, but after a while, the main page will look rather cluttered.
Yeah, that was my point. And I was just thinking about the Set Profile page and what it'll look like when we're up to Natter 29 again.
[edited because-- personal pronouns! sometimes they're useful!]
Betsy HP - Oct 27, 2002 5:09:59 pm PST #639 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
We need a new line in the FAQ's ita entry:
Oh, and she's a moon in the Firefly universe.
Laura - Oct 27, 2002 5:38:37 pm PST #640 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.
Ita Moon!
§ ita § - Oct 28, 2002 3:19:10 pm PST #641 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
FYI: Out of 339 users that signed up, 215 have posted, and 14 never managed to validate.
bon bon - Oct 28, 2002 3:21:48 pm PST #642 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
How do you know who hasn't posted? (unless it's just yer general celestial omniscience)
§ ita § - Oct 28, 2002 3:23:00 pm PST #643 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Every post has a user-id associated, so I ran a list of the unique ids.
That and sheer heavenly knowledge.
Dana - Oct 28, 2002 3:26:44 pm PST #644 of 10001
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
339? Wow.
Rob - Oct 28, 2002 3:29:59 pm PST #645 of 10001
Having 63% of registered users posting is impressive, too.
DXMachina - Oct 28, 2002 4:37:49 pm PST #646 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
339? Wow.
There are some duplicates among those 339. We don't have 339 unique users, although we probably have more than 300.