And what I'm saying, is that slutting is inherently empty. You object to all slutting.

Forgive me for being unclear.

A post which is empty other than its (also empty, inherently so) slut.

Is that better? 'Cause that's what I don't like. No, what I don't like is twenty of them in a row.

(That was exaggeration. For rhetorical effect.)

I don't find it as annoying as RL does, but I do find it distracting. I vote for a higher standard too.

Hey! Stop voting!

We can't actually police random numberslutting. How the hell would that work?

Although I also think it's weird and annoying when someone gets all excited about getting, say, 6044.

We can't actually police random numberslutting. How the hell would that work?

There's no way to police it, of course. But we've dealt with other things that couldn't exactly be policed, either. And I'm just saying, it's not an important thing, but it's very annoying to me, and if it's very annoying to some other people, then a spell of excessive and nothing-else numberslutting could become one of the things that people are conscious of as being annoying to others. I said self-restraint.

(I'm tired and headachey. Am I sounding really snotty here? I'm going to go to bed soon.)

It didn't work with the campaign against "wrod". I think these things are organic.

It didn't work with the campaign against "wrod".

grumble

It didn't work with the campaign against "wrod".

I swear I can think of other things it's been said to have worked for, and I'm only coming up, right now, with the points in Natter when someone asked that the fun-fun-profanity sessions be truncated or toned down. Or content stuff. But I swear I remember it.

t loopy

Ah shit I'm just going to go to bed.

It didn't work with the campaign against "wrod".

There was a campaign?

I think there was Jessica.