'Serenity'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I understand where you're coming from on trying to ease this, Hec, but really, it's up to an individual to work out how and how much of any thread they can handle. There are people who are intimidated by the volume in the show threads too. What do we do then? There's a million ways to handle it, and there will be no pop quiz at the end.
So you miss stuff. It'll be okay.
Yeah. I hate to say it, but I'd be hopeless at summarizing. Someone asked me the other day what was going on in Natter, and my response was basically, "Uh...I dunno. Stuff?"
And I agree that when people have asked for a summary, it's been provided. We don't need a whole institutionalized thing. It's not like Natter is, you know, important.
I think that it's okay to miss stuff is inherent in Natter. That's why it's called Natter, and not Terribly Important Things You Need to Know.
I insist on large batches of grumpy East Coasters backing you up before I give up on this entertaining idea.
I'm on the East Coast, I'm grumpy thanks to lack of sleep (seriously. You have no idea.), and I'm willing to back them up. I mean, what if the Companion of the moment skipped and skimmed like a flat rock across the still waters of the Murray to get there? (...This picture doesn't make me any happier to be at work.) What if their windows of opportunity for the posting are tiny things? What if I happen to numberslut at 2 in the morning, and all the summary you get is "Phwooaargh"?
Fraught. I should definitely be putting that into a sentence about now, but again with the sleep deprivation. Still, fraught. Oh, and Phwooaargh.
Yeah.
standing in the no summary corner
I like it when *other* people summarize, but I can't do it well. Cause I can't remember the last 10 posts, let alone 100.
Not complaining -- just highly amused that my link to Rebecca's post of John's update report got moved to Beep Me, so that it's a relocated link to a link to a posting that contains a letter, which seems like quite a lot of layers of meta.
why it's called Natter, and not Terribly Important Things You Need to Know.
Snerk. And, wrod.
Theo, I'm trying to maintain the distinction between beep and press -- personal news goes in beep me, but I didn't want it to look like linking it was *my* idea, so credit where credit is due.
I dithered over which topic to use, as it was a bit of news that I'd have been sorry to miss -- I've been wondering how John is doing, and it had been a chattery night, so more people are likely to have been skipping.